It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MKGAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOASMY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MKGAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OASMY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
MKGAF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -2.31% price change this week, while OASMY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.55%.
OASMY is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
MKGAF | OASMY | MKGAF / OASMY | |
Capitalization | 76.6B | 12.8M | 598,438% |
EBITDA | 6.45B | -88.39M | -7,298% |
Gain YTD | -9.441 | 150.000 | -6% |
P/E Ratio | 20.96 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 22.3B | 1.02M | 2,197,044% |
Total Cash | 1.72B | 119M | 1,446% |
Total Debt | 10.6B | 7.89M | 134,296% |
MKGAF | OASMY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MKGAF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as OASMY (46). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to OASMY’s over the last 12 months.
MKGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as OASMY (100). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to OASMY’s over the last 12 months.
MKGAF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as OASMY (97). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to OASMY’s over the last 12 months.
OASMY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKGAF (78). This means that OASMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKGAF’s over the last 12 months.
MKGAF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OASMY (100). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OASMY’s over the last 12 months.
MKGAF | OASMY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago29% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago21% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago58% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JULQ | 25.16 | N/A | N/A |
Innovator Premium Income 40 Bar ETF -Jul | |||
EASG | 29.78 | -0.74 | -2.42% |
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Eq ETF | |||
EWS | 21.76 | -0.66 | -2.94% |
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | |||
FDTX | 35.61 | -1.41 | -3.81% |
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF | |||
QTEC | 191.38 | -8.56 | -4.28% |
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Tech Sector ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKGAF has been loosely correlated with MKKGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKGAF jumps, then MKKGY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MKGAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MKGAF | 100% | +0.95% | ||
MKKGY - MKGAF | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
AQST - MKGAF | 19% Poorly correlated | -10.13% | ||
INDV - MKGAF | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
EVO - MKGAF | 17% Poorly correlated | -9.41% | ||
EBS - MKGAF | 16% Poorly correlated | -7.17% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that OASMY and MVMDF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OASMY and MVMDF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OASMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OASMY | 100% | N/A | ||
MVMDF - OASMY | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
MKGAF - OASMY | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
NXSCF - OASMY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PCLOF - OASMY | 2% Poorly correlated | -10.64% | ||
NDVAF - OASMY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |