MKTDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
643.32K
SMWB
Price
$7.63
Change
-$0.51 (-6.27%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
708.48M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MKTDF vs SMWB

Header iconMKTDF vs SMWB Comparison
Open Charts MKTDF vs SMWBBanner chart's image
Deepmarkit
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization643.32K
Similarweb
Price$7.63
Change-$0.51 (-6.27%)
Volume$525.02K
Capitalization708.48M
MKTDF vs SMWB Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MKTDF vs. SMWB commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKTDF is a Hold and SMWB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (MKTDF: $0.04 vs. SMWB: $7.63)
Brand notoriety: MKTDF and SMWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MKTDF: 77% vs. SMWB: 101%
Market capitalization -- MKTDF: $643.32K vs. SMWB: $708.48M
MKTDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $643.32K. SMWB’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $708.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MKTDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMWB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MKTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMWB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MKTDF and SMWB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMWB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMWB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MKTDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMWB (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMWB is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.68% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMWB($708M) has a higher market cap than MKTDF($643K). MKTDF YTD gains are higher at: -6.667 vs. SMWB (-46.154). MKTDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.48M vs. SMWB (-18.55M). SMWB has more cash in the bank: 71.7M vs. MKTDF (204K). MKTDF has less debt than SMWB: MKTDF (40K) vs SMWB (67.4M). SMWB has higher revenues than MKTDF: SMWB (218M) vs MKTDF (1.75K).
MKTDFSMWBMKTDF / SMWB
Capitalization643K708M0%
EBITDA-8.48M-18.55M46%
Gain YTD-6.667-46.15414%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.75K218M0%
Total Cash204K71.7M0%
Total Debt40K67.4M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MKTDF: Fundamental Ratings
MKTDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRMTX164.87N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech Investor
MICIX9.48N/A
N/A
Victory Trivalent Intl Fd-Core Eq I
MAPOX110.40N/A
N/A
Mairs & Power Balanced
MDOEX11.05N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity I
MTCBX43.16-0.62
-1.42%
MFS Technology B

MKTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKTDF and CCLD have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKTDF and CCLD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKTDF
1D Price
Change %
MKTDF100%
N/A
CCLD - MKTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
GUNGF - MKTDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMTO - MKTDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.73%
MITK - MKTDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.90%
SMWB - MKTDF
19%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
More

SMWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMWB has been loosely correlated with BL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMWB jumps, then BL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMWB
1D Price
Change %
SMWB100%
-6.27%
BL - SMWB
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
TDC - SMWB
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
TWLO - SMWB
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
DASH - SMWB
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
TBLA - SMWB
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
More