Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKVHX vs TRIGX
MKVHX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts MKVHX vs TRIGX
MFS International Large Cap Value R6
Price$16.81
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.35B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.43
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.42B
MKVHX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKVHX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKVHX is a Sell and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. MKVHX (7.35B). MKVHX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: MKVHX (2.51) vs TRIGX (2.05). MKVHX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: MKVHX (5 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than MKVHX (0.75). MKVHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). MKVHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: MKVHX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.91 vs. MKVHX (17.64). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 96.87 vs. MKVHX (71.53).
| MKVHX | TRIGX | MKVHX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.87 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.87 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.659 | 31.607 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.35B | 16.4B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 2.05 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.64 | 23.91 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.37 | 83.62 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.53 | 96.87 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers