Ad is loading...
MLALX vs TFBIX
MLALX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts MLALX vs TFBIX
MFS AL Municipal Bond I
Price$8.67
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.62M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
MLALX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLALX vs. TFBIX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLALX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. MLALX (67.6M). TFBIX (3.42) and MLALX (3.35) have matching dividends . MLALX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: MLALX (9 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). MLALX (0.84) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.42). TFBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.70 vs. MLALX (24.00). MLALX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: MLALX (0) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. MLALX (0.67). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.91 vs. MLALX (2.84).
| MLALX | TFBIX | MLALX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.42 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.42 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.871 | -2.755 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.6M | 2.28B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 3.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.67 | 1.05 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.11 | 4.94 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.84 | 4.91 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers