Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLALX vs TFBIX
MLALX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts MLALX vs TFBIX
MFS AL Municipal Bond I
Price$8.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.74M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
MLALX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLALX vs. TFBIX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLALX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. MLALX (65.7M). TFBIX (3.58) and MLALX (3.50) have matching dividends . MLALX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: MLALX (9 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). MLALX (0.83) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). MLALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. TFBIX (17.30). MLALX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: MLALX (0) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.84 vs. MLALX (-1.67). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.43 vs. MLALX (-0.21).
| MLALX | TFBIX | MLALX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.41 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.41 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.714 | -1.357 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.7M | 2.28B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 3.58 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -0.84 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.98 | 7.35 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.21 | 2.43 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement