Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLALX vs TFBIX
MLALX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts MLALX vs TFBIX
MFS AL Municipal Bond I
Price$8.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.95M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
MLALX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLALX vs. TFBIX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLALX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. MLALX (66M). TFBIX (3.53) and MLALX (3.45) have matching dividends . MLALX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: MLALX (9 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). MLALX (0.84) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). MLALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. TFBIX (17.30). MLALX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: MLALX (0) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.29 vs. MLALX (-2.18). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.72 vs. MLALX (-1.70).
| MLALX | TFBIX | MLALX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.41 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.41 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.922 | -2.471 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66M | 2.26B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.45 | 3.53 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.18 | -1.29 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.83 | 3.86 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.70 | 0.72 | -237% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement