Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLCPX vs SPMGX
MLCPX vs SPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLCPX vs. SPMGX commentary
Jun 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLCPX is a Buy and SPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMGX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. MLCPX (826M). SPMGX (5.50) and MLCPX (5.24) have matching dividends . MLCPX was incepted earlier than SPMGX: MLCPX (11 years) vs SPMGX (6 years). MLCPX (12.21) is less costly to investors than SPMGX (3.36). SPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MLCPX (15.31). SPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLCPX: SPMGX (1000) vs MLCPX (2500). SPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.37 vs. MLCPX (18.67). SPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 194.90 vs. MLCPX (181.73).
| MLCPX | SPMGX | MLCPX / SPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 12.21 | 3.36 | 363% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 12.21 | 3.36 | 363% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.360 | 3.161 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 826M | 1.09B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.24 | 5.50 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.67 | 24.37 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.78 | 66.09 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.73 | 194.90 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers