Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLFKX vs RBKTX
MLFKX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLFKX vs. RBKTX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLFKX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLFKX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: MLFKX (2.67) vs RBKTX (0.52). MLFKX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: MLFKX (9 years) vs RBKTX (19 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than MLFKX (0.62). MLFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). MLFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: MLFKX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.52 vs. MLFKX (10.44). MLFKX return over 5 years is better than : 45.30 vs. RBKTX (39.69).
| MLFKX | RBKTX | MLFKX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.45 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.45 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.173 | 15.323 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 50.2B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 0.52 | 515% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 13.52 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.05 | 43.60 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.30 | 39.69 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement