MLFNF
Price
$25.37
Change
-$0.25 (-0.98%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
SGLJF
Price
$15.04
Change
-$2.56 (-14.55%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLFNF vs SGLJF

Header iconMLFNF vs SGLJF Comparison
Open Charts MLFNF vs SGLJFBanner chart's image
Maple Leaf Foods
Price$25.37
Change-$0.25 (-0.98%)
Volume$6.05K
Capitalization3.16B
Strauss Group
Price$15.04
Change-$2.56 (-14.55%)
Volume$564
Capitalization3.15B
MLFNF vs SGLJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLFNF vs. SGLJF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLFNF is a Buy and SGLJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MLFNF: $25.37 vs. SGLJF: $15.04)
Brand notoriety: MLFNF and SGLJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLFNF: 16% vs. SGLJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MLFNF: $3.16B vs. SGLJF: $3.15B
MLFNF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $3.16B. SGLJF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLFNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLFNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGLJF is a better buy in the long-term than MLFNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLFNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MLFNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MLFNF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while SGLJF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLFNF($3.16B) and SGLJF($3.15B) have the same market capitalization . MLFNF has higher P/E ratio than SGLJF: MLFNF (24.30) vs SGLJF (20.08). MLFNF YTD gains are higher at: 79.929 vs. SGLJF (0.000). SGLJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.55B vs. MLFNF (638M). SGLJF has more cash in the bank: 436M vs. MLFNF (236M). MLFNF has less debt than SGLJF: MLFNF (1.76B) vs SGLJF (2.47B). SGLJF has higher revenues than MLFNF: SGLJF (7.25B) vs MLFNF (5.1B).
MLFNFSGLJFMLFNF / SGLJF
Capitalization3.16B3.15B100%
EBITDA638M1.55B41%
Gain YTD79.9290.000-
P/E Ratio24.3020.08121%
Revenue5.1B7.25B70%
Total Cash236M436M54%
Total Debt1.76B2.47B71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLFNF vs SGLJF: Fundamental Ratings
MLFNF
SGLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9142
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
6742
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3974
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
845

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGLJF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MLFNF (29). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew similarly to MLFNF’s over the last 12 months.

MLFNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (100). This means that MLFNF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLJF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MLFNF (67). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew similarly to MLFNF’s over the last 12 months.

MLFNF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGLJF (74). This means that MLFNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLJF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLFNF (100). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FACNX78.03N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Canada A
PMBJX43.82N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap J
PSCJX24.47N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Small Company R4
FMKFX21.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity Magellan K6
TSPTX6.12N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Growth I3

MLFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLFNF and BRCC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLFNF and BRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLFNF
1D Price
Change %
MLFNF100%
-0.98%
BRCC - MLFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
SGLJF - MLFNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCRA - MLFNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
MRRTY - MLFNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
NCHEY - MLFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLJF and KIKOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLJF and KIKOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLJF
1D Price
Change %
SGLJF100%
N/A
KIKOF - SGLJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLFNF - SGLJF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
SUEZY - SGLJF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRBZF - SGLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
PIFMY - SGLJF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More