MLGF
Price
$20.17
Change
-$0.18 (-0.88%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
190.08M
RBKB
Price
$13.41
Change
-$0.15 (-1.11%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
148.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLGF vs RBKB

Header iconMLGF vs RBKB Comparison
Open Charts MLGF vs RBKBBanner chart's image
Malaga Financial
Price$20.17
Change-$0.18 (-0.88%)
Volume$15.78K
Capitalization190.08M
Rhinebeck Ban
Price$13.41
Change-$0.15 (-1.11%)
Volume$6.46K
Capitalization148.98M
MLGF vs RBKB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBKB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLGF vs. RBKB commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLGF is a StrongBuy and RBKB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MLGF: $20.17 vs. RBKB: $13.41)
Brand notoriety: MLGF and RBKB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLGF: 504% vs. RBKB: 31%
Market capitalization -- MLGF: $190.08M vs. RBKB: $148.98M
MLGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $190.08M. RBKB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $148.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBKB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RBKB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBKB is a better buy in the long-term than MLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBKB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • RBKB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBKB is a better buy in the short-term than MLGF.

Price Growth

MLGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while RBKB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLGF($190M) has a higher market cap than RBKB($149M). RBKB has higher P/E ratio than MLGF: RBKB (23.44) vs MLGF (8.40). RBKB YTD gains are higher at: 38.728 vs. MLGF (-7.716). RBKB has less debt than MLGF: RBKB (31.8M) vs MLGF (263M). MLGF has higher revenues than RBKB: MLGF (45.3M) vs RBKB (33.5M).
MLGFRBKBMLGF / RBKB
Capitalization190M149M128%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.71638.728-20%
P/E Ratio8.4023.4436%
Revenue45.3M33.5M135%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt263M31.8M827%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLGF vs RBKB: Fundamental Ratings
MLGF
RBKB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7278
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1935
SMR RATING
1..100
5191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5613
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLGF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBKB (82) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBKB’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as RBKB (35) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew similarly to RBKB’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBKB (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBKB’s over the last 12 months.

RBKB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MLGF (73) in the null industry. This means that RBKB’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RBKB's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLGF (56) in the null industry. This means that RBKB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLGFRBKB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBKB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORRCF0.19N/A
+1.56%
Oroco Resource Corp.
EAATF0.02N/A
N/A
Earthworks Industries Inc.
SIGGF1.96N/A
N/A
Sigma Healthcare Limited
NWSZF0.83N/A
N/A
CTF Services Limited
AAYYY10.31N/A
N/A
Australian Agricultural Co Ltd.

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and RBKB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and RBKB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
N/A
RBKB - MLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
FSRL - MLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMUV - MLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKF - MLGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLYBY - MLGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More

RBKB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBKB and ONBPO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBKB and ONBPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBKB
1D Price
Change %
RBKB100%
-1.07%
ONBPO - RBKB
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
FRMEP - RBKB
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
TCBS - RBKB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
ONBPP - RBKB
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
BRBS - RBKB
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.58%
More