MLGF
Price
$20.35
Change
-$0.21 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
41.82M
RBKB
Price
$11.74
Change
+$0.14 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLGF vs RBKB

Header iconMLGF vs RBKB Comparison
Open Charts MLGF vs RBKBBanner chart's image
Malaga Financial
Price$20.35
Change-$0.21 (-1.02%)
Volume$7.56K
Capitalization41.82M
Rhinebeck Ban
Price$11.74
Change+$0.14 (+1.21%)
Volume$100
Capitalization93.56M
MLGF vs RBKB Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLGF vs. RBKB commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLGF is a Hold and RBKB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MLGF: $20.35 vs. RBKB: $11.60)
Brand notoriety: MLGF and RBKB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLGF: 360% vs. RBKB: 77%
Market capitalization -- MLGF: $41.82M vs. RBKB: $93.56M
MLGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $41.82M. RBKB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $93.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBKB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MLGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RBKB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MLGF and RBKB are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

MLGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while RBKB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBKB is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.66% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKB($93.6M) has a higher market cap than MLGF($41.8M). RBKB has higher P/E ratio than MLGF: RBKB (20.50) vs MLGF (7.61). RBKB YTD gains are higher at: 19.959 vs. MLGF (-8.028). RBKB has less debt than MLGF: RBKB (133M) vs MLGF (263M). RBKB has higher revenues than MLGF: RBKB (43.7M) vs MLGF (18M).
MLGFRBKBMLGF / RBKB
Capitalization41.8M93.6M45%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.02819.959-40%
P/E Ratio7.6120.5037%
Revenue18M43.7M41%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt263M133M198%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLGF vs RBKB: Fundamental Ratings
MLGF
RBKB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5316
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1152
SMR RATING
1..100
1832
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6714
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLGF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBKB (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBKB’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBKB (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBKB’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as RBKB (32) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew similarly to RBKB’s over the last 12 months.

RBKB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MLGF (58) in the null industry. This means that RBKB’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RBKB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLGF (67) in the null industry. This means that RBKB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAIL12.170.06
+0.50%
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
DFIV42.510.01
+0.02%
Dimensional International Value ETF
CSF51.03N/A
N/A
VictoryShares US Discovery Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
JHML71.08-0.06
-0.08%
JHancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
FXG63.08-0.37
-0.58%
First Trust Cnsmr Staples AlphaDEX® ETF

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and RBKB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and RBKB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
-1.02%
RBKB - MLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
FSRL - MLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
CMUV - MLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKF - MLGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLYBY - MLGF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RBKB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBKB and ONBPO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBKB and ONBPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBKB
1D Price
Change %
RBKB100%
-0.60%
ONBPO - RBKB
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
FRMEP - RBKB
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
TCBS - RBKB
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
ONBPP - RBKB
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
BRBS - RBKB
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More