MLLGF
Price
$9.89
Change
+$0.19 (+1.96%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
880.89M
ULH
Price
$30.11
Change
+$2.72 (+9.93%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
792.89M
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLLGF vs ULH

Header iconMLLGF vs ULH Comparison
Open Charts MLLGF vs ULHBanner chart's image
Mullen Group
Price$9.89
Change+$0.19 (+1.96%)
Volume$46K
Capitalization880.89M
Universal Logistics Holdings
Price$30.11
Change+$2.72 (+9.93%)
Volume$57.71K
Capitalization792.89M
MLLGF vs ULH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLLGF vs. ULH commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLLGF is a StrongBuy and ULH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MLLGF: $9.89 vs. ULH: $30.11)
Brand notoriety: MLLGF and ULH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucking industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLLGF: 13% vs. ULH: 131%
Market capitalization -- MLLGF: $880.89M vs. ULH: $792.89M
MLLGF [@Trucking] is valued at $880.89M. ULH’s [@Trucking] market capitalization is $792.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucking] industry ranges from $35.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucking] industry is $4.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLLGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileULH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLLGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ULH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLLGF is a better buy in the long-term than ULH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLLGF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLLGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ULH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MLLGF and ULH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MLLGF (@Trucking) experienced а -1.98% price change this week, while ULH (@Trucking) price change was +19.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was +5.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

ULH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucking (+5.21% weekly)

The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLLGF($881M) has a higher market cap than ULH($793M). ULH has higher P/E ratio than MLLGF: ULH (13.03) vs MLLGF (12.12). MLLGF YTD gains are higher at: -2.369 vs. ULH (-33.916). MLLGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 336M vs. ULH (290M). MLLGF has more cash in the bank: 131M vs. ULH (32.6M). ULH has less debt than MLLGF: ULH (839M) vs MLLGF (995M). MLLGF has higher revenues than ULH: MLLGF (2.02B) vs ULH (1.74B).
MLLGFULHMLLGF / ULH
Capitalization881M793M111%
EBITDA336M290M116%
Gain YTD-2.369-33.9167%
P/E Ratio12.1213.0393%
Revenue2.02B1.74B117%
Total Cash131M32.6M402%
Total Debt995M839M119%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLLGF vs ULH: Fundamental Ratings
MLLGF
ULH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5016
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3065
SMR RATING
1..100
6557
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLLGF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as ULH (35) in the Trucking industry. This means that MLLGF’s stock grew similarly to ULH’s over the last 12 months.

MLLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ULH (65) in the Trucking industry. This means that MLLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ULH’s over the last 12 months.

ULH's SMR Rating (57) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as MLLGF (65) in the null industry. This means that ULH’s stock grew similarly to MLLGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLLGF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as ULH (62) in the Trucking industry. This means that MLLGF’s stock grew similarly to ULH’s over the last 12 months.

ULH's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as MLLGF (27) in the null industry. This means that ULH’s stock grew similarly to MLLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLLGFULH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSOIX40.860.14
+0.34%
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class I
GOFCX27.14N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth C
HMCNX15.21N/A
N/A
Harbor Mid Cap Investor
SHSAX58.29N/A
N/A
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Inv A
VLSRX17.81N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6

MLLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLLGF and TFII have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLLGF and TFII's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLLGF100%
+1.96%
TFII - MLLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.02%
CVLG - MLLGF
16%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
NXTN - MLLGF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
SNDR - MLLGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
ULH - MLLGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+9.93%
More

ULH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULH has been loosely correlated with CVLG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULH jumps, then CVLG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULH
1D Price
Change %
ULH100%
+9.93%
CVLG - ULH
61%
Loosely correlated
+4.05%
ARCB - ULH
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
MRTN - ULH
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
SNDR - ULH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
RXO - ULH
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
More