Advertisement
MLLGF vs ULH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLLGF is a Hold and ULH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MLLGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MLLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ULH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MLLGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MLLGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ULH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
MLLGF (@Trucking) experienced а +8.05% price change this week, while ULH (@Trucking) price change was +3.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
ULH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucking (+2.50% weekly)The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.
| MLLGF | ULH | MLLGF / ULH | |
| Capitalization | 862M | 632M | 136% |
| EBITDA | 330M | 290M | 114% |
| Gain YTD | -3.258 | -47.282 | 7% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.14 | 10.40 | 117% |
| Revenue | 2.07B | 1.74B | 119% |
| Total Cash | 177M | 32.6M | 543% |
| Total Debt | 1.19B | 839M | 142% |
MLLGF | ULH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MLLGF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as ULH (27) in the Trucking industry. This means that MLLGF’s stock grew similarly to ULH’s over the last 12 months.
MLLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ULH (80) in the Trucking industry. This means that MLLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ULH’s over the last 12 months.
ULH's SMR Rating (57) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as MLLGF (68) in the null industry. This means that ULH’s stock grew similarly to MLLGF’s over the last 12 months.
MLLGF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as ULH (82) in the Trucking industry. This means that MLLGF’s stock grew similarly to ULH’s over the last 12 months.
ULH's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as MLLGF (36) in the null industry. This means that ULH’s stock grew similarly to MLLGF’s over the last 12 months.
| MLLGF | ULH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FMSGX | 17.07 | 0.06 | +0.35% |
| Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Instl | |||
| JMIEX | 37.04 | 0.13 | +0.35% |
| JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity L | |||
| QIORX | 17.98 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
| AQR International Momentum Style R6 | |||
| DIAMX | 28.71 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| Diamond Hill Long-Short Inv | |||
| MPMCX | 15.29 | -0.06 | -0.39% |
| BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy M | |||
MLLGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MLLGF and TFII have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLLGF and TFII's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLLGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLLGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TFII - MLLGF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
| CVLG - MLLGF | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
| NXTN - MLLGF | 12% Poorly correlated | +9.09% | ||
| SNDR - MLLGF | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| ULH - MLLGF | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.67% | ||
More | ||||
ULH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULH has been loosely correlated with CVLG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULH jumps, then CVLG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULH | 100% | -2.67% | ||
| CVLG - ULH | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| MRTN - ULH | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| SNDR - ULH | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| ARCB - ULH | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| HTLD - ULH | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||