MLLUY
Price
$3.95
Change
+$0.06 (+1.54%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.09B
NWSGY
Price
$9.04
Change
-$0.58 (-6.02%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.73B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLLUY vs NWSGY

Header iconMLLUY vs NWSGY Comparison
Open Charts MLLUY vs NWSGYBanner chart's image
Metallurgical Corp China
Price$3.95
Change+$0.06 (+1.54%)
Volume$126
Capitalization4.09B
CTF Services
Price$9.04
Change-$0.58 (-6.02%)
Volume$164
Capitalization3.73B
MLLUY vs NWSGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLLUY vs. NWSGY commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLLUY is a Hold and NWSGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MLLUY: $3.95 vs. NWSGY: $9.05)
Brand notoriety: MLLUY and NWSGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLLUY: 100% vs. NWSGY: 46%
Market capitalization -- MLLUY: $4.09B vs. NWSGY: $3.73B
MLLUY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $4.09B. NWSGY’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $3.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $6.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLLUY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWSGY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MLLUY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NWSGY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWSGY is a better buy in the long-term than MLLUY.

Price Growth

MLLUY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWSGY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -6.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLLUY is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

NWSGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.53% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLLUY($4.09B) has a higher market cap than NWSGY($3.73B). NWSGY has higher P/E ratio than MLLUY: NWSGY (12.42) vs MLLUY (7.12). NWSGY YTD gains are higher at: 10.318 vs. MLLUY (7.046). MLLUY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.5B vs. NWSGY (6.29B). MLLUY has higher revenues than NWSGY: MLLUY (524B) vs NWSGY (24.6B).
MLLUYNWSGYMLLUY / NWSGY
Capitalization4.09B3.73B110%
EBITDA11.5B6.29B183%
Gain YTD7.04610.31868%
P/E Ratio7.1212.4257%
Revenue524B24.6B2,130%
Total Cash50.2BN/A-
Total Debt134BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLLUY vs NWSGY: Fundamental Ratings
MLLUY
NWSGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4036
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7432
SMR RATING
1..100
698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLLUY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as NWSGY (19). This means that MLLUY’s stock grew similarly to NWSGY’s over the last 12 months.

NWSGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLLUY (74). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

NWSGY's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLLUY (69). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

NWSGY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MLLUY (52). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew similarly to MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

MLLUY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWSGY (51). This means that MLLUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWSGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIICX10.21N/A
N/A
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Instl
ACAAX34.05N/A
N/A
Alger Capital Appreciation A
RGERX20.25N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity Inst2
IVKSX21.14N/A
N/A
VY® Invesco Comstock S
TGREX11.78N/A
N/A
TCW Global Real Estate I

MLLUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLLUY and KAJMF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLLUY and KAJMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLLUY
1D Price
Change %
MLLUY100%
N/A
KAJMF - MLLUY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNOCF - MLLUY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSGY - MLLUY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRCR - MLLUY
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
LTOUF - MLLUY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWSGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWSGY and OBSJF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWSGY and OBSJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWSGY
1D Price
Change %
NWSGY100%
N/A
OBSJF - NWSGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOPHY - NWSGY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLLUY - NWSGY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSZF - NWSGY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTOUF - NWSGY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More