Ad is loading...
MLMCX vs RNPFX
MLMCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts MLMCX vs RNPFX
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C
Price$19.56
Change+$0.08 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$63.52
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.32B
MLMCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLMCX vs. RNPFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLMCX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. MLMCX (43.7M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: RNPFX (0.82) vs MLMCX (0.00). MLMCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: MLMCX (9 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). MLMCX (3.12) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: RNPFX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. RNPFX (5.68). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 75.27 vs. RNPFX (48.27).
| MLMCX | RNPFX | MLMCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.46 | 457% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.12 | 0.46 | 678% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.862 | 2.386 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 5.68 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 28.41 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.27 | 48.27 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.66 | - |