Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLMCX vs RNPHX
MLMCX vs RNPHX Comparison
Open Charts MLMCX vs RNPHX
MLMCX vs RNPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLMCX vs. RNPHX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLMCX is a Buy and RNPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPHX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. MLMCX (67.1M). RNPHX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: RNPHX (1.15) vs MLMCX (0.00). MLMCX was incepted earlier than RNPHX: MLMCX (10 years) vs RNPHX (11 years). MLMCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than RNPHX (0.55). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RNPHX (23.00). RNPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: RNPHX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.49 vs. RNPHX (7.76). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.22 vs. RNPHX (13.39).
| MLMCX | RNPHX | MLMCX / RNPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.55 | 382% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 0.55 | 484% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.569 | 8.066 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.1M | 166B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.49 | 7.76 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.71 | 44.20 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.22 | 13.39 | 285% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.76 | 111.38 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement