Ad is loading...
MLPB vs UMI
MLPB vs UMI Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLPB vs. UMI commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPB is a Buy and UMI is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UMI has more net assets: 362M vs. MLPB (244M). MLPB has a higher annual dividend yield than UMI: MLPB (11.327) vs UMI (3.786). MLPB was incepted earlier than UMI: MLPB (9 years) vs UMI (4 years).
| MLPB | UMI | MLPB / UMI | |
| Gain YTD | 11.327 | 3.786 | 299% |
| Net Assets | 244M | 362M | 67% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | N/A | 17.00 | - |
| Yield | 5.87 | 4.54 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| UMI | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NABAX | 12.02 | N/A | N/A |
| Neuberger Berman Abs Ret Multi-Mgr A | |||
| TOLCX | 15.11 | -0.04 | -0.26% |
| DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure C | |||
| IGIFX | 38.34 | -0.17 | -0.44% |
| American Funds Intl Gr and Inc F1 | |||
| MVGLX | 17.06 | -0.08 | -0.47% |
| MFS Low Volatility Global Equity R3 | |||
| SLVRX | 33.23 | -0.55 | -1.63% |
| Columbia Select Large Cap Value R | |||
MLPB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLPB has been closely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLPB jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPB | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| ET - MLPB | 77% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| ENLC - MLPB | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NGL - MLPB | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
| GEL - MLPB | 0% Poorly correlated | -3.07% | ||
| CQP - MLPB | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
More | ||||
UMI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMI has been closely correlated with DTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMI jumps, then DTM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y