Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLPFX vs TMLAX
MLPFX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLPFX vs. TMLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPFX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. TMLAX (123M). MLPFX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: MLPFX (6.28) vs TMLAX (4.09). MLPFX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: MLPFX (16 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). MLPFX (6%) and TMLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MLPFX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.47 vs. TMLAX (-0.90). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 205.42 vs. TMLAX (100.50).
| MLPFX | TMLAX | MLPFX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 10.29 | 1.56 | 660% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.29 | 1.56 | 660% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.732 | 2.584 | 222% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 123M | 1,633% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.28 | 4.09 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | -0.90 | -497% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.39 | 40.52 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 205.42 | 100.50 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.64 | 64.32 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement