MLPNF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.04 (-1.73%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
256.08M
NVAAF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
107.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLPNF vs NVAAF

Header iconMLPNF vs NVAAF Comparison
Open Charts MLPNF vs NVAAFBanner chart's image
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$2.27
Change-$0.04 (-1.73%)
Volume$169.4K
Capitalization256.08M
Nova Minerals
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$831
Capitalization107.28M
MLPNF vs NVAAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLPNF vs. NVAAF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPNF is a Buy and NVAAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MLPNF: $2.27 vs. NVAAF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: MLPNF and NVAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLPNF: 119% vs. NVAAF: 65%
Market capitalization -- MLPNF: $256.08M vs. NVAAF: $107.28M
MLPNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $256.08M. NVAAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $107.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLPNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNVAAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NVAAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVAAF is a better buy in the long-term than MLPNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLPNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVAAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLPNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NVAAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVAAF is a better buy in the short-term than MLPNF.

Price Growth

MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +19.98% price change this week, while NVAAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPNF($256M) has a higher market cap than NVAAF($107M). MLPNF YTD gains are higher at: 948.741 vs. NVAAF (11.111).
MLPNFNVAAFMLPNF / NVAAF
Capitalization256M107M239%
EBITDA-3.98MN/A-
Gain YTD948.74111.1118,539%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash7.5MN/A-
Total Debt88.9KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NVAAF: Fundamental Ratings
NVAAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLPNFNVAAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDCB9.210.16
+1.77%
Third Century Bancorp
RAFLF0.80N/A
N/A
Raffles Medical Group Ltd.
VLQCF0.29N/A
N/A
Quantum Graphite Ltd.
TOKUY12.48N/A
N/A
Tokyu Corp.
SHECY15.71-0.13
-0.82%
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and SIERF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and SIERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
-1.88%
SIERF - MLPNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCMF - MLPNF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USGO - MLPNF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
CAPFF - MLPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NVAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVAAF and MLPNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVAAF and MLPNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVAAF
1D Price
Change %
NVAAF100%
N/A
MLPNF - NVAAF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
TMASF - NVAAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.57%
LTRBF - NVAAF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADMLF - NVAAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - NVAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More