MLPNF
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.07 (-4.38%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
183.18M
NVAAF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
78.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLPNF vs NVAAF

Header iconMLPNF vs NVAAF Comparison
Open Charts MLPNF vs NVAAFBanner chart's image
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$1.53
Change-$0.07 (-4.38%)
Volume$115.02K
Capitalization183.18M
Nova Minerals
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization78.82M
MLPNF vs NVAAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLPNF vs. NVAAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPNF is a Hold and NVAAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MLPNF: $1.53 vs. NVAAF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: MLPNF and NVAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLPNF: 82% vs. NVAAF: 37%
Market capitalization -- MLPNF: $183.18M vs. NVAAF: $78.82M
MLPNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $183.18M. NVAAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $78.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLPNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNVAAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NVAAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVAAF is a better buy in the long-term than MLPNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLPNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVAAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLPNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NVAAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MLPNF and NVAAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.89% price change this week, while NVAAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPNF($183M) has a higher market cap than NVAAF($78.8M). MLPNF YTD gains are higher at: 606.861 vs. NVAAF (11.111).
MLPNFNVAAFMLPNF / NVAAF
Capitalization183M78.8M232%
EBITDA-3.98MN/A-
Gain YTD606.86111.1115,462%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash7.5MN/A-
Total Debt88.9KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NVAAF: Fundamental Ratings
NVAAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLPNFNVAAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRGTX10.22N/A
N/A
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate S
FSRFX105.62N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Transportation
FUGAX47.17N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Utilities A
FGSIX69.21N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth IS
WWMCX11.80N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality Midcap Institutional

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and SIERF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and SIERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
-4.55%
SIERF - MLPNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCMF - MLPNF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USGO - MLPNF
13%
Poorly correlated
+7.48%
CAPFF - MLPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NVAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVAAF and MLPNF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVAAF and MLPNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVAAF
1D Price
Change %
NVAAF100%
N/A
MLPNF - NVAAF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
TMASF - NVAAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.65%
LTRBF - NVAAF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADMLF - NVAAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - NVAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More