MLPNF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.03 (-6.82%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
14.65M
SIERF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Mar 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.94M
Ad is loading...

MLPNF vs SIERF

Header iconMLPNF vs SIERF Comparison
Open Charts MLPNF vs SIERFBanner chart's image
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$0.41
Change-$0.03 (-6.82%)
Volume$127.88K
Capitalization14.65M
Sierra Grande Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$4.8K
Capitalization2.94M
MLPNF vs SIERF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLPNF vs. SIERF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPNF is a Hold and SIERF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MLPNF: $0.44 vs. SIERF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: MLPNF and SIERF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLPNF: 62% vs. SIERF: 54%
Market capitalization -- MLPNF: $14.65M vs. SIERF: $2.94M
MLPNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $14.65M. SIERF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLPNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIERF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SIERF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIERF is a better buy in the long-term than MLPNF.

Price Growth

MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -11.93% price change this week, while SIERF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.65% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPNF($14.7M) has a higher market cap than SIERF($2.94M). SIERF YTD gains are higher at: 110.210 vs. MLPNF (103.280). SIERF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -791.89K vs. MLPNF (-3.1M). MLPNF has more cash in the bank: 1.9M vs. SIERF (389K). MLPNF has less debt than SIERF: MLPNF (0) vs SIERF (513K). MLPNF (0) and SIERF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MLPNFSIERFMLPNF / SIERF
Capitalization14.7M2.94M499%
EBITDA-3.1M-791.89K392%
Gain YTD103.280110.21094%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.9M389K489%
Total Debt0513K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SIERF: Fundamental Ratings
SIERF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
96
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LFGCX30.63N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
VWILX103.82N/A
N/A
Vanguard International Growth Adm
ISMOX3.82N/A
N/A
Voya MidCap Opportunities Port S
NDVBX15.99N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery Value B
RLAIX18.19N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Latin America I

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and SIERF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and SIERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
+0.27%
SIERF - MLPNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USCUF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+12.57%
GRCMF - MLPNF
18%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
OBRUF - MLPNF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SIERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIERF and LITSF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIERF and LITSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIERF
1D Price
Change %
SIERF100%
N/A
LITSF - SIERF
27%
Poorly correlated
-22.33%
MLPNF - SIERF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
SLROF - SIERF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWXPF - SIERF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKMSF - SIERF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More