MLSPF
Price
$8.26
Change
+$0.41 (+5.22%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
10.01B
MSUXF
Price
$13.07
Change
+$0.26 (+2.03%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLSPF vs MSUXF

Header iconMLSPF vs MSUXF Comparison
Open Charts MLSPF vs MSUXFBanner chart's image
Melrose Industries
Price$8.26
Change+$0.41 (+5.22%)
Volume$4.44K
Capitalization10.01B
Misumi Group
Price$13.07
Change+$0.26 (+2.03%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization4.21B
MLSPF vs MSUXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSUXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLSPF vs. MSUXF commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLSPF is a Hold and MSUXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (MLSPF: $8.26 vs. MSUXF: $13.07)
Brand notoriety: MLSPF and MSUXF are both not notable
MLSPF represents the Industrial Machinery, while MSUXF is part of the Tools & Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLSPF: 68% vs. MSUXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MLSPF: $10.01B vs. MSUXF: $4.21B
MLSPF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $10.01B. MSUXF’s [@Tools & Hardware] market capitalization is $4.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $216.06B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tools & Hardware] industry ranges from $23.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tools & Hardware] industry is $6.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSUXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MLSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSUXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLSPF is a better buy in the long-term than MSUXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLSPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSUXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MSUXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSUXF is a better buy in the short-term than MLSPF.

Price Growth

MLSPF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while MSUXF (@Tools & Hardware) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.32% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Tools & Hardware (-1.80% weekly)

Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLSPF($10B) has a higher market cap than MSUXF($4.21B). MLSPF has higher P/E ratio than MSUXF: MLSPF (24.87) vs MSUXF (14.64). MLSPF YTD gains are higher at: 15.881 vs. MSUXF (-16.521). MSUXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.3B vs. MLSPF (887M). MSUXF has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. MLSPF (124M). MSUXF has higher revenues than MLSPF: MSUXF (386B) vs MLSPF (3.45B).
MLSPFMSUXFMLSPF / MSUXF
Capitalization10B4.21B237%
EBITDA887M62.3B1%
Gain YTD15.881-16.521-96%
P/E Ratio24.8714.64170%
Revenue3.45B386B1%
Total Cash124M145B0%
Total Debt1.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLSPF vs MSUXF: Fundamental Ratings
MLSPF
MSUXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
928
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4381
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3490
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSUXF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLSPF (60). This means that MSUXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLSPF’s over the last 12 months.

MLSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSUXF (100). This means that MLSPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSUXF’s over the last 12 months.

MSUXF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLSPF (92). This means that MSUXF’s stock grew significantly faster than MLSPF’s over the last 12 months.

MLSPF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSUXF (81). This means that MLSPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSUXF’s over the last 12 months.

MLSPF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSUXF (90). This means that MLSPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSUXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLSPFMSUXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSUXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DREGX42.52N/A
N/A
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Inv
VYRDX13.68-0.05
-0.36%
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II R6
DVLCX23.71-0.12
-0.50%
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value C
NRIQX14.82-0.10
-0.67%
Neuberger Berman International Eq R6
FMACX46.30-0.38
-0.81%
American Funds AMCAP F3

MLSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLSPF and SPXSY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLSPF and SPXSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLSPF
1D Price
Change %
MLSPF100%
+5.18%
SPXSY - MLSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
VACNY - MLSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
ATLCY - MLSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
FSCR - MLSPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBGSY - MLSPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More

MSUXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSUXF has been loosely correlated with HAIIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSUXF jumps, then HAIIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSUXF
1D Price
Change %
MSUXF100%
N/A
HAIIF - MSUXF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MLSPF - MSUXF
12%
Poorly correlated
+5.18%
MKTAY - MSUXF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
NCTKF - MSUXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRSKF - MSUXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More