Ad is loading...
MLXCX vs SMFPX
MLXCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLXCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLXCX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. MLXCX (359M). MLXCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: MLXCX (4.14) vs SMFPX (3.38). MLXCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: MLXCX (10 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). MLXCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.13). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. MLXCX (22.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLXCX: SMFPX (1000) vs MLXCX (2500). MLXCX (11.52) and SMFPX (11.11) have marching annual gain over last year. MLXCX return over 5 years is better than : 234.86 vs. SMFPX (164.96).
| MLXCX | SMFPX | MLXCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.13 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 2.13 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.903 | -8.971 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 1.14B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.14 | 3.38 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.52 | 11.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.15 | 34.05 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 234.86 | 164.96 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.42 | 7.25 | 323% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...