MLYNF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.16 (-6.58%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
23.78B
RBNK
Price
$23.99
Change
+$1.87 (+8.45%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLYNF vs RBNK

Header iconMLYNF vs RBNK Comparison
Open Charts MLYNF vs RBNKBanner chart's image
Malayan Banking Berhad
Price$2.27
Change-$0.16 (-6.58%)
Volume$2.81K
Capitalization23.78B
RiverBank Holding
Price$23.99
Change+$1.87 (+8.45%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
MLYNF vs RBNK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLYNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBNK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLYNF vs. RBNK commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLYNF is a Hold and RBNK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MLYNF: $2.27 vs. RBNK: $23.99)
Brand notoriety: MLYNF and RBNK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLYNF: 148% vs. RBNK: 100%
Market capitalization -- MLYNF: $23.78B vs. RBNK: $0
MLYNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.78B. RBNK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLYNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBNK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLYNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBNK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLYNF is a better buy in the long-term than RBNK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLYNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBNK’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLYNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RBNK’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBNK is a better buy in the short-term than MLYNF.

Price Growth

MLYNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.46% price change this week, while RBNK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBNK YTD gains are higher at: 25.340 vs. MLYNF (14.341).
MLYNFRBNKMLYNF / RBNK
Capitalization23.8BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.34125.34057%
P/E Ratio9.13N/A-
Revenue25.9BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt53.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLYNF: Fundamental Ratings
MLYNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
5
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLYNFRBNK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLYNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBNK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWF442.946.02
+1.38%
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
KLXY24.470.06
+0.25%
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
VPC20.360.04
+0.18%
Virtus Private Credit ETF
IGLD21.90-0.02
-0.09%
FT Vest Gold Strategy Trgt Inc ETF
SMIN72.00-0.55
-0.76%
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF

MLYNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLYNF has been loosely correlated with BKAHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLYNF jumps, then BKAHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLYNF
1D Price
Change %
MLYNF100%
-6.46%
BKAHF - MLYNF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CITZ - MLYNF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RBNK - MLYNF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
THVB - MLYNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
FCOB - MLYNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More

RBNK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBNK has been loosely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBNK jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBNK
1D Price
Change %
RBNK100%
N/A
MLYNF - RBNK
36%
Loosely correlated
-6.46%
BKAHF - RBNK
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBKOF - RBNK
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
STBK - RBNK
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
WOBK - RBNK
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More