MMC
Price
$197.78
Change
-$3.64 (-1.81%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
82 days until earnings call
SLQT
Price
$1.60
Change
+$0.06 (+3.87%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MMC vs SLQT ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconMMC vs SLQT Comparison
Open Charts MMC vs SLQTBanner chart's image
Marsh & McLennan Companies
Price$197.78
Change-$3.64 (-1.81%)
Volume$457.59K
CapitalizationN/A
SelectQuote
Price$1.60
Change+$0.06 (+3.87%)
Volume$119.85K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MMC vs SLQT Comparison Chart

Loading...

MMCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SLQTDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
MMC vs. SLQT commentary
Apr 27, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMC is a Hold and SLQT is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2024
Stock price -- (MMC: $197.95 vs. SLQT: $1.61)
Brand notoriety: MMC and SLQT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MMC: 108% vs. SLQT: 53%
Market capitalization -- MMC: $100.63B vs. SLQT: $337.99M
MMC [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $100.63B. SLQT’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $337.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $20.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MMC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLQT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLQT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMC is a better buy in the long-term than SLQT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLQT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SLQT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMC is a better buy in the short-term than SLQT.

Price Growth

MMC (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while SLQT (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -6.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -4.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

MMC is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2024.

SLQT is expected to report earnings on Sep 11, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (-4.00% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MMC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SLQT with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMC($101B) has a higher market cap than SLQT($338M). MMC has higher P/E ratio than SLQT: MMC (27.08) vs SLQT (6.88). SLQT YTD gains are higher at: 17.518 vs. MMC (4.850). MMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.32B vs. SLQT (56.5M). MMC has more cash in the bank: 3.36B vs. SLQT (10.8M). SLQT has less debt than MMC: SLQT (724M) vs MMC (15.4B). MMC has higher revenues than SLQT: MMC (22.7B) vs SLQT (1.16B).
MMCSLQTMMC / SLQT
Capitalization101B338M29,882%
EBITDA6.32B56.5M11,181%
Gain YTD4.85017.51828%
P/E Ratio27.086.88393%
Revenue22.7B1.16B1,959%
Total Cash3.36B10.8M31,093%
Total Debt15.4B724M2,127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMC: Fundamental Ratings
MMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMCSLQT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MMCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SLQTDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DISCX23.580.30
+1.29%
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund C
FACPX36.960.44
+1.20%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret M
NSFMX11.820.09
+0.77%
Natixis Sustainable Future 2060 N
CSMIX42.320.32
+0.76%
Columbia Small Cap Value I A
LMCKX7.580.03
+0.40%
Miller Income FI

MMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMC has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMC jumps, then AON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMC
1D Price
Change %
MMC100%
-1.75%
AON - MMC
86%
Closely correlated
-6.85%
AJG - MMC
81%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
BRO - MMC
71%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
WTW - MMC
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
ERIE - MMC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
More

SLQT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLQT has been loosely correlated with EHTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLQT jumps, then EHTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLQT
1D Price
Change %
SLQT100%
+3.87%
EHTH - SLQT
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
GOCO - SLQT
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
BRP - SLQT
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
MMC - SLQT
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
WTW - SLQT
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
More