Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMCFX vs TRCLX
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MMCFX vs TRCLX
AMG Veritas China N
Price$18.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.93M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.72
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.25M
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 61.3M vs. MMCFX (47.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: TRCLX (1.39) vs MMCFX (1.06). MMCFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MMCFX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MMCFX (1.48). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MMCFX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX (47.81) and MMCFX (47.43) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.47 vs. MMCFX (-49.35).
| MMCFX | TRCLX | MMCFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.03 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.10 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.197 | 29.924 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.9M | 61.3M | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.39 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.43 | 47.81 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.20 | 20.27 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.35 | 1.47 | -3,361% |
| Returns for 10 years | -56.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement