Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMCFX vs TRCLX
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MMCFX vs TRCLX
AMG Veritas China N
Price$17.97
Change-$0.36 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.82M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.63
Change-$0.31 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.12M
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMCFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMCFX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.1M vs. MMCFX (48.8M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: TRCLX (1.34) vs MMCFX (0.95). MMCFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MMCFX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MMCFX (1.48). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MMCFX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.66 vs. MMCFX (20.37). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.00 vs. MMCFX (-53.16).
| MMCFX | TRCLX | MMCFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.03 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.10 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.677 | 32.008 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.8M | 66.1M | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.34 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.37 | 22.66 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.16 | 37.21 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -53.16 | -1.00 | 5,338% |
| Returns for 10 years | -54.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement