Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMCFX vs TRCLX
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MMCFX vs TRCLX
AMG Veritas China N
Price$15.94
Change-$0.27 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.93M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.24
Change-$0.06 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.63M
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 52.6M vs. MMCFX (43.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: TRCLX (1.61) vs MMCFX (1.19). MMCFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MMCFX (31 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MMCFX (1.48). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MMCFX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.72 vs. MMCFX (28.62). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.38 vs. MMCFX (-54.18).
| MMCFX | TRCLX | MMCFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.03 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.10 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.985 | 16.477 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.9M | 52.6M | 83% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.61 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.62 | 30.72 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.96 | 4.08 | -366% |
| Returns for 5 years | -54.18 | -7.38 | 735% |
| Returns for 10 years | -63.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement