Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMCFX vs TRCLX
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MMCFX vs TRCLX
AMG Veritas China N
Price$15.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.93M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.13M
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 44.1M vs. MMCFX (41.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: TRCLX (1.69) vs MMCFX (1.23). MMCFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MMCFX (31 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MMCFX (1.48). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MMCFX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). MMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. TRCLX (5.69). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.56 vs. MMCFX (-58.30).
| MMCFX | TRCLX | MMCFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.03 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.10 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.361 | 8.333 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 44.1M | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | 5.69 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.22 | -5.14 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | -58.30 | -1.56 | 3,727% |
| Returns for 10 years | -66.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers