Ad is loading...
MMCFX vs TRCLX
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MMCFX vs TRCLX
AMG Veritas China N
Price$13.57
Change+$0.56 (+4.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.19M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.33
Change+$0.57 (+5.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.87M
MMCFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 39.9M vs. MMCFX (37.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: TRCLX (1.68) vs MMCFX (1.19). MMCFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MMCFX (31 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MMCFX (1.33). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). MMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MMCFX (2000) vs TRCLX (500000). MMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.29 vs. TRCLX (-3.81). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.96 vs. MMCFX (-54.17).
| MMCFX | TRCLX | MMCFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.03 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.10 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.701 | -7.576 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 39.9M | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.68 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | -3.81 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.42 | -18.88 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -54.17 | -1.96 | 2,768% |
| Returns for 10 years | -70.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...