Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMFKX vs RDBTX
MMFKX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMFKX vs. RDBTX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMFKX is a Hold and RDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.83B vs. MMFKX (25.9M). MMFKX pays higher dividends than RDBTX: MMFKX (3.61) vs RDBTX (2.72). MMFKX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: MMFKX (7 years) vs RDBTX (18 years). MMFKX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RDBTX (0.64). MMFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RDBTX (6.00). MMFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDBTX: MMFKX (0) vs RDBTX (250). RDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. MMFKX (8.37). RDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.22 vs. MMFKX (13.59).
| MMFKX | RDBTX | MMFKX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.64 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.64 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.344 | 7.038 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9M | 4.83B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 2.72 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.37 | 8.82 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.86 | 20.43 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.59 | 23.22 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement