Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMFKX vs RDBTX
MMFKX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMFKX vs. RDBTX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMFKX is a Hold and RDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.8B vs. MMFKX (7.14M). MMFKX pays higher dividends than RDBTX: MMFKX (3.45) vs RDBTX (2.60). MMFKX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: MMFKX (8 years) vs RDBTX (19 years). MMFKX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RDBTX (0.64). MMFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RDBTX (6.00). MMFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDBTX: MMFKX (0) vs RDBTX (250). MMFKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.43 vs. RDBTX (7.26). RDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.01 vs. MMFKX (10.26).
| MMFKX | RDBTX | MMFKX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.64 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.64 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.951 | 10.884 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.14M | 4.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.45 | 2.60 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.43 | 7.26 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.50 | 25.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.26 | 21.01 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement