MMM
Price
$144.41
Change
-$4.81 (-3.22%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
58.7B
86 days until earnings call
PG
Price
$150.65
Change
+$0.18 (+0.12%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
381.78B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MMM vs PG

Header iconMMM vs PG Comparison
Open Charts MMM vs PGBanner chart's image
3M
Price$144.41
Change-$4.81 (-3.22%)
Volume$4.07M
Capitalization58.7B
Procter & Gamble
Price$150.65
Change+$0.18 (+0.12%)
Volume$8.59M
Capitalization381.78B
MMM vs PG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MMM vs. PG commentary
Aug 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMM is a StrongBuy and PG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PG: $150.65)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the short-term than MMM.

Price Growth

PG (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -4.83% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

PG is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.84% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($382B) has a higher market cap than MMM($58.7B). PG has higher P/E ratio than MMM: PG (26.90) vs MMM (10.77). MMM YTD gains are higher at: 12.972 vs. PG (-8.407). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.6B vs. MMM (-6.76B). PG has more cash in the bank: 7.89B vs. MMM (5.99B). MMM has less debt than PG: MMM (16.9B) vs PG (33.7B). PG has higher revenues than MMM: PG (83.9B) vs MMM (32.7B).
MMMPGMMM / PG
Capitalization58.7B382B15%
EBITDA-6.76B22.6B-30%
Gain YTD12.972-8.407-154%
P/E Ratio10.7726.9040%
Revenue32.7B83.9B39%
Total Cash5.99B7.89B76%
Total Debt16.9B33.7B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMM vs PG: Fundamental Ratings
MMM
PG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6135
SMR RATING
1..100
1432
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9771
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PG's Valuation (42) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMM (92) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MMM (61) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's SMR Rating (14) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PG (32) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PG (61) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

PG's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MMM (97) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMMPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTKI18.69N/A
N/A
First Trust Small Cap Buywrite Income ETF
MYI10.37-0.01
-0.10%
Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund III
DVY133.93-1.12
-0.83%
iShares Select Dividend ETF
XRMI17.59-0.15
-0.83%
Global X S&P 500® Risk Managed Inc ETF
QVMS25.59-0.35
-1.34%
Invesco S&P SmallCp 600 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF

MMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMM has been loosely correlated with IIIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMM jumps, then IIIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMM
1D Price
Change %
MMM100%
-3.22%
IIIN - MMM
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
GFF - MMM
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
HON - MMM
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
TRC - MMM
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
WOR - MMM
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More