MMM
Price
$150.78
Change
+$3.03 (+2.05%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
58.7B
33 days until earnings call
TRC
Price
$17.00
Change
+$0.42 (+2.53%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
412.79M
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MMM vs TRC

Header iconMMM vs TRC Comparison
Open Charts MMM vs TRCBanner chart's image
3M
Price$150.78
Change+$3.03 (+2.05%)
Volume$51.76K
Capitalization58.7B
Tejon Ranch
Price$17.00
Change+$0.42 (+2.53%)
Volume$414
Capitalization412.79M
MMM vs TRC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MMM vs. TRC commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMM is a StrongBuy and TRC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MMM and TRC are a good buy in the short-term.
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMM($58.7B) has a higher market cap than TRC($413M). TRC has higher P/E ratio than MMM: TRC (128.00) vs MMM (10.77). MMM YTD gains are higher at: 15.584 vs. TRC (4.277). TRC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11M vs. MMM (-6.76B). MMM has more cash in the bank: 5.99B vs. TRC (64.5M). TRC has less debt than MMM: TRC (47.9M) vs MMM (16.9B). MMM has higher revenues than TRC: MMM (32.7B) vs TRC (44.7M).
MMMTRCMMM / TRC
Capitalization58.7B413M14,213%
EBITDA-6.76B1.11M-610,569%
Gain YTD15.5844.277364%
P/E Ratio10.77128.008%
Revenue32.7B44.7M73,154%
Total Cash5.99B64.5M9,281%
Total Debt16.9B47.9M35,282%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMM vs TRC: Fundamental Ratings
MMM
TRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
721
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5872
SMR RATING
1..100
1489
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9899
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRC's Valuation (88) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMM (90) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TRC’s stock grew similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TRC (72) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to TRC’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's SMR Rating (14) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRC (89) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew significantly faster than TRC’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TRC (51) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to TRC’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TRC (99) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to TRC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMMTRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LQDA13.600.34
+2.56%
Liquidia Corp
CVV2.960.06
+2.07%
CVD Equipment Corp
FERG219.400.25
+0.11%
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
WU8.51-0.05
-0.58%
Western Union Company (The)
RNGR12.00-0.46
-3.69%
Ranger Energy Services

MMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMM has been loosely correlated with IIIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMM jumps, then IIIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMM
1D Price
Change %
MMM100%
-1.41%
IIIN - MMM
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
GFF - MMM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
HON - MMM
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
TRC - MMM
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
WOR - MMM
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
More