MMM vs TRC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMM is a StrongBuy and TRC is a StrongSell.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MMM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
| MMM | TRC | MMM / TRC | |
| Capitalization | 58.7B | 413M | 14,213% |
| EBITDA | -6.76B | 1.11M | -610,569% |
| Gain YTD | 48.500 | -6.163 | -787% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.77 | 128.00 | 8% |
| Revenue | 32.7B | 44.7M | 73,154% |
| Total Cash | 5.99B | 64.5M | 9,281% |
| Total Debt | 16.9B | 47.9M | 35,282% |
MMM | TRC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TRC's Valuation (84) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMM (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TRC’s stock grew similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.
MMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TRC (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to TRC’s over the last 12 months.
MMM's SMR Rating (13) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRC (87) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew significantly faster than TRC’s over the last 12 months.
MMM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TRC (57) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to TRC’s over the last 12 months.
TRC's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMM (99) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TRC’s stock grew significantly faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.
| MMM | TRC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 1 day ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 53% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MCCPX | 22.12 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Inv C | |||
| OANLX | 82.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Oakmark Select Institutional | |||
| FHGIX | 15.92 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes Global Equity IS | |||
| GPGIX | 3.58 | -0.03 | -0.83% |
| Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Instl | |||
| BRSIX | 12.54 | -0.22 | -1.72% |
| Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market | |||
MMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMM has been loosely correlated with IIIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMM jumps, then IIIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMM | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| IIIN - MMM | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| GFF - MMM | 41% Loosely correlated | +18.20% | ||
| HON - MMM | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| TRC - MMM | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| HAYN - MMM | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
TRC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRC has been loosely correlated with MDU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRC jumps, then MDU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRC | 100% | -3.12% | ||
| MDU - TRC | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| IIIN - TRC | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| CODI - TRC | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MATW - TRC | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| TUSK - TRC | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||