MMM
Price
$141.03
Change
+$1.85 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
58.7B
2 days until earnings call
TRC
Price
$16.10
Change
-$0.10 (-0.62%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
412.79M
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MMM vs TRC

Header iconMMM vs TRC Comparison
Open Charts MMM vs TRCBanner chart's image
3M
Price$141.03
Change+$1.85 (+1.33%)
Volume$5.72M
Capitalization58.7B
Tejon Ranch
Price$16.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.62%)
Volume$63.53K
Capitalization412.79M
MMM vs TRC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MMM vs. TRC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMM is a Hold and TRC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMM is a better buy in the short-term than TRC.
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMM($58.7B) has a higher market cap than TRC($413M). TRC has higher P/E ratio than MMM: TRC (128.00) vs MMM (10.77). MMM YTD gains are higher at: 9.249 vs. TRC (1.258). TRC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11M vs. MMM (-6.76B). MMM has more cash in the bank: 5.99B vs. TRC (64.5M). TRC has less debt than MMM: TRC (47.9M) vs MMM (16.9B). MMM has higher revenues than TRC: MMM (32.7B) vs TRC (44.7M).
MMMTRCMMM / TRC
Capitalization58.7B413M14,213%
EBITDA-6.76B1.11M-610,569%
Gain YTD9.2491.258735%
P/E Ratio10.77128.008%
Revenue32.7B44.7M73,154%
Total Cash5.99B64.5M9,281%
Total Debt16.9B47.9M35,282%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMM vs TRC: Fundamental Ratings
MMM
TRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4525
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66100
SMR RATING
1..100
1389
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
984
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRC's Valuation (82) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMM (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TRC’s stock grew similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRC (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRC’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's SMR Rating (13) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRC (89) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew significantly faster than TRC’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRC (53) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRC’s over the last 12 months.

TRC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMM (98) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that TRC’s stock grew significantly faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMMTRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YSG3.370.27
+8.71%
Yatsen Holding Limited
WDC65.040.79
+1.23%
Western Digital Corp
ADMA16.02-0.61
-3.67%
ADMA Biologics
RVSN1.09-0.06
-5.22%
Rail Vision Ltd
WOLF6.28-0.48
-7.10%
Wolfspeed

MMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMM has been loosely correlated with IIIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMM jumps, then IIIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMM
1D Price
Change %
MMM100%
+1.33%
IIIN - MMM
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.82%
GFF - MMM
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
HON - MMM
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
TRC - MMM
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
WOR - MMM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
More