MMRGF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
83.06M
PAAS
Price
$33.11
Change
+$0.60 (+1.85%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.98B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MMRGF vs PAAS

Header iconMMRGF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts MMRGF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Minaurum Gold
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$153.75K
Capitalization83.06M
Pan American Silver
Price$33.11
Change+$0.60 (+1.85%)
Volume$3.47M
Capitalization11.98B
MMRGF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MMRGF vs. PAAS commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMRGF is a Hold and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MMRGF: $0.20 vs. PAAS: $33.11)
Brand notoriety: MMRGF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MMRGF: 63% vs. PAAS: 78%
Market capitalization -- MMRGF: $83.06M vs. PAAS: $11.98B
MMRGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $83.06M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $11.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MMRGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MMRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than MMRGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MMRGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MMRGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMRGF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

MMRGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.89% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4292.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($12B) has a higher market cap than MMRGF($83.1M). MMRGF YTD gains are higher at: 74.216 vs. PAAS (65.778). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. MMRGF (-3.76M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 900M vs. MMRGF (1.72M). PAAS has higher revenues than MMRGF: PAAS (3.12B) vs MMRGF (0).
MMRGFPAASMMRGF / PAAS
Capitalization83.1M12B1%
EBITDA-3.76M1.41B-0%
Gain YTD74.21665.778113%
P/E RatioN/A22.83-
Revenue03.12B-
Total Cash1.72M900M0%
Total DebtN/A804M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMRGF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
MMRGF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7024
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
9785
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1190

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMRGF (68) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMRGF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMRGF (97) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMRGF (45) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMRGF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MMRGFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNRS29.640.79
+2.74%
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
KBWY16.03-0.01
-0.06%
Invesco KBW Premium Yield Eq REIT ETF
AOD9.10-0.01
-0.11%
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
NORW29.61-0.04
-0.13%
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
BWET12.59-0.18
-1.37%
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF

MMRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMRGF has been loosely correlated with BTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMRGF jumps, then BTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMRGF
1D Price
Change %
MMRGF100%
+5.26%
BTG - MMRGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
NGD - MMRGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
PAAS - MMRGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
EGO - MMRGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.16%
EQX - MMRGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
More