Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMSIX vs NAESX
MMSIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MMSIX vs NAESX
Praxis Small Cap Index I
Price$12.75
Change+$0.11 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.4M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.55
Change-$1.06 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
MMSIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMSIX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMSIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. MMSIX (199M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MMSIX: NAESX (1.23) vs MMSIX (1.08). MMSIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MMSIX (18 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MMSIX (0.44) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MMSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.31 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMSIX: NAESX (3000) vs MMSIX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. MMSIX (6.62). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.94 vs. MMSIX (48.54).
| MMSIX | NAESX | MMSIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.17 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.17 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.686 | 7.579 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 199M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.23 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.62 | 9.54 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.62 | 49.41 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.54 | 57.94 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.92 | 133.88 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement