Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MMUFX vs PCUFX
MMUFX vs PCUFX Comparison
Open Charts MMUFX vs PCUFX
MMUFX vs PCUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MMUFX vs. PCUFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MMUFX is a Hold and PCUFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCUFX has more cash in the bank: 3.29B vs. MMUFX (2.52B). MMUFX pays higher dividends than PCUFX: MMUFX (1.88) vs PCUFX (1.29). MMUFX was incepted earlier than PCUFX: MMUFX (34 years) vs PCUFX (31 years). PCUFX (1.63) is less costly to investors than MMUFX (1.01). MMUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. PCUFX (47.00). MMUFX (1000) and PCUFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.44 vs. MMUFX (3.54). MMUFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.48 vs. PCUFX (9.05).
| MMUFX | PCUFX | MMUFX / PCUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.63 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.63 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.540 | 7.267 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 3.29B | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 4.44 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.76 | 0.43 | 645% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.48 | 9.05 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.45 | 24.72 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers