MNA | SPCX | MNA / SPCX | |
Gain YTD | 5.795 | 7.650 | 76% |
Net Assets | 234M | 8.84M | 2,648% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.31 | 33% |
Turnover | 386.00 | 274.00 | 141% |
Yield | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | - |
MNA | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNA has been loosely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNA jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPCX and CLBR have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPCX and CLBR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPCX | 100% | -0.78% | ||
CLBR - SPCX | 16% Poorly correlated | +7.12% | ||
ECDA - SPCX | 11% Poorly correlated | -8.29% | ||
VMCAF - SPCX | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TRUG - SPCX | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.28% | ||
ESHA - SPCX | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |