MNAT
Price
$29.39
Change
+$0.39 (+1.34%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
PCLB
Price
$27.92
Change
+$0.07 (+0.25%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
Ad is loading...

MNAT vs PCLB

Header iconMNAT vs PCLB Comparison
Open Charts MNAT vs PCLBBanner chart's image
Marquette National
Price$29.39
Change+$0.39 (+1.34%)
Volume$11.9K
CapitalizationN/A
Pinnacle Bancshares
Price$27.92
Change+$0.07 (+0.25%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
MNAT vs PCLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
MNAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNAT vs. PCLB commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNAT is a Buy and PCLB is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (MNAT: $29.39 vs. PCLB: $27.65)
Brand notoriety: MNAT and PCLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNAT: 1071% vs. PCLB: 12%
Market capitalization -- MNAT: $121.92M vs. PCLB: $17.84M
MNAT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $121.92M. PCLB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $17.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCLB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PCLB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MNAT and PCLB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCLB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PCLB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCLB is a better buy in the short-term than MNAT.

Price Growth

MNAT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.34% price change this week, while PCLB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNAT($122M) has a higher market cap than PCLB($17.8M). PCLB YTD gains are higher at: 48.297 vs. MNAT (11.903). PCLB has less debt than MNAT: PCLB (9.39M) vs MNAT (144M). MNAT has higher revenues than PCLB: MNAT (64.9M) vs PCLB (8.19M).
MNATPCLBMNAT / PCLB
Capitalization122M17.8M685%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.90348.29725%
P/E Ratio6.96N/A-
Revenue64.9M8.19M793%
Total Cash31.3MN/A-
Total Debt144M9.39M1,534%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNAT vs PCLB: Fundamental Ratings
MNAT
PCLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5035
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7679
SMR RATING
1..100
4612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNAT's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCLB (48). This means that MNAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCLB’s over the last 12 months.

MNAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as PCLB (79). This means that MNAT’s stock grew similarly to PCLB’s over the last 12 months.

PCLB's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNAT (46). This means that PCLB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNAT’s over the last 12 months.

PCLB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MNAT (50). This means that PCLB’s stock grew similarly to MNAT’s over the last 12 months.

PCLB's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MNAT (57). This means that PCLB’s stock grew similarly to MNAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNATPCLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MNAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGRN47.130.03
+0.06%
iShares USD Green Bond ETF
FLTR25.48N/A
N/A
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
MBOX33.74-0.37
-1.07%
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
XDQQ34.07-0.52
-1.51%
Innovator Gr 100 Acltd ETF™ Quarterly
RNWZ20.57-1.38
-6.30%
TrueShares Eagle Glbl Rnwbls Engy IncETF

MNAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNAT and BSPA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNAT and BSPA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNAT
1D Price
Change %
MNAT100%
+1.34%
BSPA - MNAT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCLB - MNAT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIFF - MNAT
14%
Poorly correlated
+6.87%
MNMB - MNAT
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFDB - MNAT
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PCLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCLB and SCGLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCLB and SCGLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCLB
1D Price
Change %
PCLB100%
N/A
SCGLF - PCLB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCYY - PCLB
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.87%
WBBW - PCLB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFNW - PCLB
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
SUTNY - PCLB
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
More