Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.39
Change-$0.06 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.18M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.34
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. MNBAX (522M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.86) vs RLBCX (1.53). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. MNBAX (2.36). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.08 vs. MNBAX (7.80).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.253 | 9.979 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 255B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.53 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 7.35 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.26 | 35.06 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.80 | 35.08 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.02 | 73.22 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement