Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.36
Change-$0.09 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets511.03M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.15
Change-$0.16 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNBAX (511M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.86) vs RLBCX (1.53). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. MNBAX (1.81). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.19 vs. MNBAX (11.59).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.566 | 12.593 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.53 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 7.76 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.34 | 49.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.59 | 42.19 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.88 | 79.25 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement