Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.10
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.49M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.79
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.12B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. MNBAX (520M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.89) vs RLBCX (1.56). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.04 vs. MNBAX (4.77). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.79 vs. MNBAX (8.66).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.950 | 8.359 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 520M | 253B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.56 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | 11.04 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.25 | 29.84 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.66 | 34.79 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.11 | 60.65 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement