Ad is loading...
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$18.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.61M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$33.05
Change+$0.34 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. MNBAX (502M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.98) vs RLBCX (1.69). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MNBAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBAX (71.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). MNBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.86 vs. RLBCX (1.33). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.89 vs. MNBAX (12.58).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.658 | -3.879 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 225B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 1.69 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 1.33 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 11.21 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 30.89 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.43 | 40.86 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...