Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.48
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.66M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.43
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. MNBAX (440M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.83) vs RLBCX (1.46). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. MNBAX (4.40). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.24 vs. MNBAX (6.51).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.087 | 13.420 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 440M | 264B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 8.46 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.71 | 39.37 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.51 | 36.24 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.39 | 67.41 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement