Ad is loading...
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$19.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.92M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.14
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.54B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. MNBAX (521M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.98) vs RLBCX (1.69). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MNBAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBAX (71.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBCX (3.92) and MNBAX (3.85) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.99 vs. MNBAX (25.20).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.469 | 0.323 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 1.69 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 3.92 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.42 | 11.56 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.20 | 47.99 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.48 | 49.82 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...