Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBCX
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBCX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.08
Change+$0.12 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.6M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.18
Change+$0.26 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.64B
MNBAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. MNBAX (526M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: MNBAX (1.93) vs RLBCX (1.63). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBCX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. MNBAX (4.69). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. MNBAX (14.42).
| MNBAX | RLBCX | MNBAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.012 | 6.562 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 526M | 248B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.63 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | 7.01 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.35 | 31.59 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.42 | 40.82 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.16 | 60.76 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers