Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBEX
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.96M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.94
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. MNBAX (508M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MNBAX (1.85) vs RLBEX (1.74). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBEX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. MNBAX (2.61). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.04 vs. MNBAX (9.57).
| MNBAX | RLBEX | MNBAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.191 | 14.631 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 1.74 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.61 | 8.70 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.71 | 50.52 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.57 | 42.04 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.44 | 77.69 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement