Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBEX
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.39
Change-$0.06 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.18M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.53
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. MNBAX (522M). MNBAX (1.86) and RLBEX (1.79) have matching dividends . MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBEX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. MNBAX (2.36). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.85 vs. MNBAX (7.80).
| MNBAX | RLBEX | MNBAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.253 | 10.177 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 255B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.79 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 7.68 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.26 | 36.13 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.80 | 36.85 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.02 | 78.64 | 51% |