Ad is loading...
MNBAX vs RLBEX
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$19.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.92M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.54B
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. MNBAX (521M). MNBAX (1.98) and RLBEX (1.97) have matching dividends . MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MNBAX (31 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). MNBAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBAX (71.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBEX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.27 vs. MNBAX (3.85). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 49.94 vs. MNBAX (25.20).
| MNBAX | RLBEX | MNBAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.60 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.60 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.469 | 0.395 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 1.97 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 4.27 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.42 | 12.39 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.20 | 49.94 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.48 | 54.43 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...