Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBEX
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$19.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.05M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$35.69
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.43B
MNBAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. MNBAX (524M). MNBAX (1.93) and RLBEX (1.90) have matching dividends . MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBEX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. MNBAX (4.66). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.57 vs. MNBAX (10.55).
| MNBAX | RLBEX | MNBAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.283 | 4.581 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 524M | 243B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.90 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 6.95 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.47 | 22.98 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | 34.57 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.31 | 61.12 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement