Ad is loading...
MNBAX vs RLBFX
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$19.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.92M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.42
Change+$0.09 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.54B
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. MNBAX (521M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBFX (2.26) vs MNBAX (1.98). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBAX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MNBAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBAX (71.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. MNBAX (3.85). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.92 vs. MNBAX (25.20).
| MNBAX | RLBFX | MNBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.30 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.30 | 347% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.469 | 0.470 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 4.59 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.42 | 13.22 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.20 | 51.92 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.48 | 55.16 | 43% |