Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBFX
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.51
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets435.49M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNBAX (435M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBFX (1.97) vs MNBAX (1.83). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. MNBAX (3.84). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. MNBAX (6.35).
| MNBAX | RLBFX | MNBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.722 | 14.331 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 435M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.97 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.84 | 9.32 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.29 | 42.18 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.35 | 40.53 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.92 | 74.39 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement