Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBFX
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$19.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.05M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.43B
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. MNBAX (524M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBFX (2.18) vs MNBAX (1.93). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. MNBAX (4.66). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.31 vs. MNBAX (10.55).
| MNBAX | RLBFX | MNBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.283 | 4.702 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 524M | 243B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 2.18 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 7.28 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.47 | 23.88 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | 36.31 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.31 | 61.89 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement