Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBAX vs RLBFX
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.36
Change-$0.09 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets511.03M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.46
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNBAX (511M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBFX (2.05) vs MNBAX (1.86). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. MNBAX (1.81). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.92 vs. MNBAX (11.59).
| MNBAX | RLBFX | MNBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.566 | 13.067 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.05 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 8.44 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.34 | 51.71 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.59 | 45.92 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.88 | 86.17 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement