Ad is loading...
MNBAX vs RLBFX
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBAX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$18.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.61M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.76
Change+$0.43 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
MNBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. MNBAX (502M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than MNBAX: RLBFX (2.26) vs MNBAX (1.98). MNBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MNBAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBAX (71.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). RLBFX (1.94) and MNBAX (1.86) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.28 vs. MNBAX (12.58).
| MNBAX | RLBFX | MNBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.30 | 347% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.30 | 347% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.658 | -3.733 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 502M | 227B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 1.94 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 12.83 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 34.28 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.43 | 45.85 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...