Ad is loading...
MNBIX vs RLBFX
MNBIX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBIX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term I
Price$18.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.03M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.9B
MNBIX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBIX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBIX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. MNBIX (501M). RLBFX (2.26) and MNBIX (2.24) have matching dividends . MNBIX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBIX (17 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MNBIX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBIX (71.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBIX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBIX (1000000). RLBFX (2.88) and MNBIX (2.77) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. MNBIX (-1.07).
| MNBIX | RLBFX | MNBIX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.808 | -3.617 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 501M | 225B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 2.26 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.77 | 2.88 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.54 | 10.75 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.07 | 33.40 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.20 | 47.01 | -17% |