Ad is loading...
MNBIX vs RLBFX
MNBIX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBIX vs RLBFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term I
Price$19.44
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.59M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.41
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.12B
MNBIX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBIX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBIX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. MNBIX (518M). RLBFX (2.26) and MNBIX (2.23) have matching dividends . MNBIX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MNBIX (17 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MNBIX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MNBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBIX: RLBFX (250) vs MNBIX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.53 vs. MNBIX (4.09). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.35 vs. MNBIX (1.48).
| MNBIX | RLBFX | MNBIX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.29 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.29 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.092 | 0.441 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 518M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 2.26 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 4.53 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.70 | 22.43 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.48 | 38.35 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.14 | 53.51 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...