Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLEFX
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.52
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.18M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$37.72
Change+$0.14 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLEFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Buy and RLEFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. MNBRX (522M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLEFX (2.00) vs MNBRX (1.65). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. MNBRX (2.22). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.54 vs. MNBRX (-2.14).
| MNBRX | RLEFX | MNBRX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.065 | 10.748 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 255B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.00 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.22 | 8.29 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.90 | 36.30 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.14 | 38.54 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement