Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLEFX
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.24M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$36.87
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.77B
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLEFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Buy and RLEFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. MNBRX (525M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLEFX (2.01) vs MNBRX (1.64). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.26 vs. MNBRX (3.10). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.12 vs. MNBRX (0.92).
| MNBRX | RLEFX | MNBRX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.510 | 8.252 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 525M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 2.01 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 7.26 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.39 | 36.77 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.92 | 40.12 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement