Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBRX vs RLEFX
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$20.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.66M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$38.68
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLEFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Hold and RLEFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. MNBRX (440M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLEFX (1.89) vs MNBRX (1.60). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. MNBRX (4.10). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.18 vs. MNBRX (-3.38).
| MNBRX | RLEFX | MNBRX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.39 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.791 | 13.936 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 440M | 264B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.10 | 9.02 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.81 | 41.38 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.38 | 39.18 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.54 | 72.67 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement