Ad is loading...
MNBRX vs RLEFX
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBRX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$19.16
Change+$0.27 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets505.06M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$33.67
Change+$0.43 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
MNBRX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBRX vs. RLEFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBRX is a Buy and RLEFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. MNBRX (505M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: RLEFX (2.16) vs MNBRX (1.73). MNBRX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBRX (15 years) vs RLEFX (9 years). MNBRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.40). RLEFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MNBRX (71.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: RLEFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. MNBRX (2.70). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.87 vs. MNBRX (2.92).
| MNBRX | RLEFX | MNBRX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.40 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.40 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.074 | -1.485 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 505M | 227B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 2.16 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | 4.35 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.04 | 14.97 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.92 | 36.87 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...