Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNBWX vs RLEFX
MNBWX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts MNBWX vs RLEFX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term W
Price$20.82
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets435.49M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$38.78
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
MNBWX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNBWX vs. RLEFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNBWX is a Hold and RLEFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. MNBWX (435M). MNBWX pays higher dividends than RLEFX: MNBWX (2.63) vs RLEFX (1.89). MNBWX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: MNBWX (7 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). MNBWX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). MNBWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). MNBWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLEFX: MNBWX (0) vs RLEFX (250). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. MNBWX (4.89). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.92 vs. MNBWX (11.44).
| MNBWX | RLEFX | MNBWX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.10 | 0.39 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.39 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.605 | 14.230 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 435M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.89 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 9.19 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.92 | 41.75 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.44 | 39.92 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement