Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNCEX vs VFWPX
MNCEX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts MNCEX vs VFWPX
Mercer Non-US Core Equity Y3
Price$13.15
Change-$0.09 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.83B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$146.94
Change-$0.85 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
MNCEX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNCEX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNCEX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. MNCEX (3.83B). MNCEX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: MNCEX (4.30) vs VFWPX (2.68). MNCEX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: MNCEX (19 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). MNCEX (0.75) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). MNCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). MNCEX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: MNCEX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). MNCEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.44 vs. VFWPX (15.14). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 47.67 vs. MNCEX (43.71).
| MNCEX | VFWPX | MNCEX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.03 | 1,233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.03 | 2,500% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.701 | 23.932 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.83B | 71.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.30 | 2.68 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.44 | 15.14 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.38 | 63.23 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.71 | 47.67 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.65 | 81.43 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement