It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNDO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSFT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNDO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MNDO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while MSFT (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.12%.
MNDO is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
MSFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
MNDO | MSFT | MNDO / MSFT | |
Capitalization | 38.3M | 3.16T | 0% |
EBITDA | 4.95M | 121B | 0% |
Gain YTD | -4.994 | -7.930 | 63% |
P/E Ratio | 7.49 | 38.39 | 20% |
Revenue | 21.6M | 228B | 0% |
Total Cash | 16.6M | 81B | 0% |
Total Debt | 642K | 88.4B | 0% |
MNDO | MSFT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNDO's Valuation (2) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MSFT (19) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MNDO’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
MSFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNDO (53) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
MSFT's SMR Rating (28) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MNDO (46) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to MNDO’s over the last 12 months.
MNDO's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MSFT (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MNDO’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
MNDO's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MSFT (66) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MNDO’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
MNDO | MSFT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago34% | 2 days ago48% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago33% | 2 days ago52% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 2 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago44% | 5 days ago48% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago39% | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNDO and CPAY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNDO and CPAY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNDO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MNDO | 100% | -0.30% | ||
CPAY - MNDO | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
LGZDF - MNDO | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SSNC - MNDO | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
PSFE - MNDO | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.53% | ||
MSFT - MNDO | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.45% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSFT has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSFT jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT | 100% | +3.45% | ||
NOW - MSFT | 65% Loosely correlated | +15.49% | ||
SNPS - MSFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.95% | ||
CDNS - MSFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +6.16% | ||
ANSS - MSFT | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
DSGX - MSFT | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.40% | ||
More |