MSFT
Price
$390.74
Change
+$0.40 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.9T
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOW
Price
$102.15
Change
-$0.93 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
105.35B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSFT vs NOW

Header iconMSFT vs NOW Comparison
Open Charts MSFT vs NOWBanner chart's image
MSFT vs NOW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Microsoft (MSFT) vs. ServiceNow (NOW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MSFT trades at around $411 with a market cap exceeding $3 trillion, showing relative stability with YTD declines of about 15%, while NOW at $92 has faced steeper pressure, down over 40% YTD amid broader software sector challenges.
  • Recent earnings for MSFT beat estimates with AI-driven growth in Azure at 34% and overall revenue up 18%, though high capex of nearly $200B projected for 2026 weighed on sentiment.
  • NOW reported Q1 subscription revenue growth of 22% to $3.67B, beating guidance, but geopolitical delays and AI disruption fears contributed to stock declines.
  • Both stocks operate in cloud and AI, but MSFT's diversified revenue streams provide broader stability compared to NOW's focus on workflow automation.
  • Valuations show MSFT at a P/E of 24.5 versus NOW's 54.8, reflecting MSFT's scale and profitability edge.
  • Tickeron's AI tools highlight sector momentum in AI infrastructure, where both tickers align, but MSFT benefits from stronger trend consistency.

Introduction

Microsoft (MSFT) and ServiceNow (NOW) represent key players in the cloud computing and enterprise software sectors, both leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) for growth amid evolving market dynamics. This stock comparison examines their recent performance, business models, and relative positioning in a volatile tech environment. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors focused on long-term AI exposure will find value in understanding contrasts in scale, revenue diversification, and responses to macroeconomic pressures like high capital expenditures (capex) and geopolitical tensions. With tech stocks navigating AI hype and sector rotations, insights into their head-to-head metrics aid informed decision-making on relative performance and market positioning.

MSFT Overview and Recent Performance

Microsoft (MSFT), a global technology leader, spans productivity tools, cloud services via Azure, and AI integrations through partnerships like OpenAI. In recent market activity, shares have hovered around $411, within a 52-week range of $356 to $555, reflecting resilience despite YTD declines of approximately 15%. Recent quarters showed revenue growth of 18% to $82.9B in Q3 FY26, with EPS at $4.27 beating estimates, driven by Azure's 34% expansion and AI contributions surging 123% year-over-year. Sentiment has been tempered by elevated capex projections nearing $200B for 2026, primarily for AI infrastructure, alongside a hiring freeze in cloud units. These factors highlight trade-offs between aggressive AI investments and margin pressures, yet Microsoft's diversified segments—including Microsoft 365 and gaming—bolster stability amid tech sector volatility.

NOW Overview and Recent Performance

ServiceNow (NOW), a provider of cloud-based workflow automation platforms, focuses on digital transformation for enterprises, increasingly incorporating AI agents for governance and operations. Shares recently traded near $92, in a 52-week range from $81 to $211, with YTD drops exceeding 40% amid software sector headwinds. Q1 2026 subscription revenues reached $3.67B, up 22% year-over-year and beating guidance, with current remaining performance obligations (cRPO) at $12.64B, growing 22.5%. Key developments include partnerships with NVIDIA, Microsoft, and Lenovo for AI-native solutions like Project Arc and Otto, aimed at enterprise AI orchestration. However, performance has been influenced by a 75-basis-point headwind from delayed Middle East deals due to regional conflicts, alongside fears of AI disrupting traditional SaaS models. These elements underscore NOW's growth potential balanced against execution risks in a competitive landscape.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, pattern recognition, and fundamental analysis (FA), operating on timeframes from 5 minutes to 49 days, with risk management via take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 169%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors reaching 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 17. Featured bots target high-momentum sectors such as semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AVGO), AI infrastructure, industrials, and leveraged ETFs, adapting to current volatility. Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions earn a spot, offering real-time signals for copy trading. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligned with today’s market trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Microsoft (MSFT) and ServiceNow (NOW) both thrive in cloud and AI, but diverge in business models: MSFT's integrated ecosystem spans Azure infrastructure, Office productivity, and gaming for diversified revenue, while NOW specializes in SaaS workflow platforms with AI agents for enterprise automation. Growth drivers contrast with MSFT's scale-fueled Azure expansion versus NOW's subscription momentum, though NOW faces higher sensitivity to deal delays. Recent momentum favors MSFT's shallower YTD decline (-15% vs. NOW's -40%), with lower beta (1.09 vs. 0.82) indicating steadier volatility. Risk factors include MSFT's massive capex straining margins and NOW's exposure to geopolitical disruptions and AI cannibalization fears. Sector exposure overlaps in tech but MSFT benefits from broader enterprise adoption. Market sentiment leans toward MSFT's stability (P/E 24.5, $3T+ cap) over NOW's growth premium (P/E 54.8), highlighting trade-offs in valuation versus upside potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI analysis favors MSFT over NOW in the current environment, based on superior trend consistency, diversified catalysts like Azure AI growth, and relative stability amid capex and volatility pressures. MSFT's larger scale and lower valuation position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance, though NOW's AI partnerships offer rebound potential if execution improves.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MSFT vs. NOW commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFT is a Hold and NOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MSFT: $390.74 vs. NOW: $102.15)
Brand notoriety: MSFT and NOW are both notable
MSFT represents the Computer Communications, while NOW is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSFT: 98% vs. NOW: 82%
Market capitalization -- MSFT: $2.9T vs. NOW: $105.35B
MSFT [@Computer Communications] is valued at $2.9T. NOW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $105.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.9T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $29.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MSFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSFT is a better buy in the long-term than NOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSFT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSFT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOW is a better buy in the short-term than MSFT.

Price Growth

MSFT (@Computer Communications) experienced а -6.22% price change this week, while NOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

NOW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-1.12% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSFT($2.9T) has a higher market cap than NOW($105B). NOW has higher P/E ratio than MSFT: NOW (60.80) vs MSFT (23.27). MSFT YTD gains are higher at: -18.845 vs. NOW (-33.318). MSFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199B vs. NOW (3.24B). MSFT has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. NOW (5.18B). NOW has less debt than MSFT: NOW (2.43B) vs MSFT (57B). MSFT has higher revenues than NOW: MSFT (318B) vs NOW (14B).
MSFTNOWMSFT / NOW
Capitalization2.9T105B2,765%
EBITDA199B3.24B6,146%
Gain YTD-18.845-33.31857%
P/E Ratio23.2760.8038%
Revenue318B14B2,271%
Total Cash78.2B5.18B1,509%
Total Debt57B2.43B2,345%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSFT vs NOW: Fundamental Ratings
MSFT
NOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6683
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5394
SMR RATING
1..100
2954
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8795
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSFT's Valuation (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as NOW (79) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to NOW’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOW (94) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's SMR Rating (29) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as NOW (54) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to NOW’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as NOW (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to NOW’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as NOW (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to NOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSFTNOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VESMX21.740.16
+0.74%
VELA Small Cap I
SMCPX36.640.25
+0.69%
ClearBridge Mid Cap 1
BGATX13.530.07
+0.55%
Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities 2
BAFSX43.280.16
+0.37%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
BMGCX21.100.01
+0.05%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Inv C

NOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOW
1D Price
Change %
NOW100%
-0.90%
CRWD - NOW
68%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
TEAM - NOW
67%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
MSFT - NOW
67%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
PANW - NOW
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
NTNX - NOW
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More