MNGPF
Price
$2.12
Change
+$0.02 (+0.95%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.4B
PGPHF
Price
$1357.47
Change
+$52.08 (+3.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
34.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNGPF vs PGPHF

Header iconMNGPF vs PGPHF Comparison
Open Charts MNGPF vs PGPHFBanner chart's image
Man Group
Price$2.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.95%)
Volume$11.05K
Capitalization2.4B
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
Price$1357.47
Change+$52.08 (+3.99%)
Volume$28
Capitalization34.4B
MNGPF vs PGPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNGPF vs. PGPHF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNGPF is a StrongBuy and PGPHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MNGPF: $2.12 vs. PGPHF: $1357.47)
Brand notoriety: MNGPF and PGPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNGPF: 331% vs. PGPHF: 38%
Market capitalization -- MNGPF: $2.4B vs. PGPHF: $34.4B
MNGPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.4B. PGPHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $34.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNGPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGPHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MNGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PGPHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MNGPF and PGPHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNGPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGPHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNGPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PGPHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNGPF is a better buy in the short-term than PGPHF.

Price Growth

MNGPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.78% price change this week, while PGPHF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGPHF($34.4B) has a higher market cap than MNGPF($2.4B). PGPHF has higher P/E ratio than MNGPF: PGPHF (23.80) vs MNGPF (13.50). PGPHF YTD gains are higher at: 2.430 vs. MNGPF (-13.330). PGPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.45B vs. MNGPF (350M). PGPHF has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. MNGPF (126M). MNGPF has less debt than PGPHF: MNGPF (395M) vs PGPHF (2.14B). PGPHF has higher revenues than MNGPF: PGPHF (2.02B) vs MNGPF (1.31B).
MNGPFPGPHFMNGPF / PGPHF
Capitalization2.4B34.4B7%
EBITDA350M1.45B24%
Gain YTD-13.3302.430-548%
P/E Ratio13.5023.8057%
Revenue1.31B2.02B65%
Total Cash126M289M44%
Total Debt395M2.14B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNGPF vs PGPHF: Fundamental Ratings
MNGPF
PGPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5673
SMR RATING
1..100
6921
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNGPF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as PGPHF (25). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as PGPHF (73). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew similarly to PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNGPF (69). This means that PGPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

PGPHF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as MNGPF (79). This means that PGPHF’s stock grew similarly to MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGPHF (71). This means that MNGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNGPFPGPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARCB75.701.27
+1.71%
ArcBest Corp
JG9.80-0.08
-0.83%
Aurora Mobile Limited
GCO33.36-0.32
-0.95%
Genesco
LEVI22.22-0.33
-1.46%
Levi Strauss & Co
IROHU9.50-0.70
-6.86%
Iron Horse Acquisitions Corp

MNGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNGPF and CG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNGPF and CG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNGPF
1D Price
Change %
MNGPF100%
+0.95%
CG - MNGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
MGPUF - MNGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
PGPHF - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
MGHCF - MNGPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPHF and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPHF and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGPHF
1D Price
Change %
PGPHF100%
+3.99%
BRDG - PGPHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLK - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
BN - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
BAM - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
IVZ - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More