Ad is loading...
MNHCX vs RBGEX
MNHCX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$23.65
Change+$1.64 (+7.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets399.12M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$22.99
Change+$1.90 (+9.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.55B
MNHCX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RBGEX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 17.6B vs. MNHCX (399M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: MNHCX (0.21) vs RBGEX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHCX (15 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). MNHCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). MNHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.46 vs. RBGEX (-11.94). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 30.99 vs. MNHCX (-1.17).
| MNHCX | RBGEX | MNHCX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.17 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.17 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.748 | -14.960 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 399M | 17.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.46 | -11.94 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.30 | -6.79 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.17 | 30.99 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.47 | 33.30 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers