Ad is loading...
MNHCX vs RBGEX
MNHCX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$25.43
Change+$0.18 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$26.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MNHCX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RBGEX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 20.8B vs. MNHCX (470M). RBGEX pays higher dividends than MNHCX: RBGEX (0.34) vs MNHCX (0.19). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHCX (15 years) vs RBGEX (10 years). MNHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RBGEX (1.00). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.99 vs. MNHCX (7.16). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.70 vs. MNHCX (1.11).
| MNHCX | RBGEX | MNHCX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.568 | 22.654 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 20.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.34 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.16 | 21.99 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.36 | 0.07 | -14,164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.11 | 34.70 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.86 | 74.14 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers