Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHCX vs RBGEX
MNHCX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHCX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L
Price$26.53
Change+$0.15 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets461.83M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$28.27
Change+$0.27 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.57B
MNHCX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHCX vs. RBGEX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHCX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. MNHCX (462M). MNHCX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: MNHCX (0.19) vs RBGEX (0.00). MNHCX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHCX (16 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). MNHCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHCX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHCX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.87 vs. MNHCX (1.04). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.42 vs. MNHCX (-2.85).
| MNHCX | RBGEX | MNHCX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.17 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.17 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.774 | 13.992 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 23.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.04 | 14.87 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.36 | 46.72 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | 38.42 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.72 | 94.75 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers