MNHFF
Price
$72.00
Change
-$0.11 (-0.15%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
SNGSF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
204.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNHFF vs SNGSF

Header iconMNHFF vs SNGSF Comparison
Open Charts MNHFF vs SNGSFBanner chart's image
Mayr-Melnhof Karton AG
Price$72.00
Change-$0.11 (-0.15%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.06B
Singamas Container Holdings
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$457.9K
Capitalization204.7M
MNHFF vs SNGSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNHFF vs. SNGSF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHFF is a Hold and SNGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MNHFF: $72.00 vs. SNGSF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: MNHFF and SNGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNHFF: 100% vs. SNGSF: 162%
Market capitalization -- MNHFF: $3.06B vs. SNGSF: $204.7M
MNHFF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $3.06B. SNGSF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $204.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNHFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNGSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MNHFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNGSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNGSF is a better buy in the long-term than MNHFF.

Price Growth

MNHFF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNGSF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+1.43% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNHFF($3.06B) has a higher market cap than SNGSF($205M). MNHFF has higher P/E ratio than SNGSF: MNHFF (13.46) vs SNGSF (5.53). MNHFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SNGSF (-11.602). MNHFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 443M vs. SNGSF (269M). SNGSF has more cash in the bank: 374M vs. MNHFF (238M). SNGSF has less debt than MNHFF: SNGSF (6.62M) vs MNHFF (1.48B). MNHFF has higher revenues than SNGSF: MNHFF (4.74B) vs SNGSF (1.17B).
MNHFFSNGSFMNHFF / SNGSF
Capitalization3.06B205M1,493%
EBITDA443M269M165%
Gain YTD0.000-11.602-
P/E Ratio13.465.53243%
Revenue4.74B1.17B406%
Total Cash238M374M64%
Total Debt1.48B6.62M22,382%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNHFF vs SNGSF: Fundamental Ratings
MNHFF
SNGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4449
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8733
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5195
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNGSF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNHFF (84). This means that SNGSF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNHFF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MNHFF (100). This means that SNGSF’s stock grew similarly to MNHFF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGSF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNHFF (87). This means that SNGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNHFF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGSF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MNHFF (81). This means that SNGSF’s stock grew similarly to MNHFF’s over the last 12 months.

MNHFF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNGSF (95). This means that MNHFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLHAX23.170.32
+1.40%
Macquarie Healthcare A
PASSX54.10N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Adv
TSORX14.97N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Res Eq A
CMPAX24.86N/A
N/A
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap A
IEMHX10.63N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Eq A

MNHFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNHFF and RPKIF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNHFF and RPKIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNHFF
1D Price
Change %
MNHFF100%
N/A
RPKIF - MNHFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TZPC - MNHFF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - MNHFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
SUMXF - MNHFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
TCLAF - MNHFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
More

SNGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNGSF and TZPC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNGSF and TZPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNGSF
1D Price
Change %
SNGSF100%
N/A
TZPC - SNGSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNHFF - SNGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - SNGSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WIPKF - SNGSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - SNGSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More