Ad is loading...
MNHRX vs RBGEX
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.65
Change+$0.16 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.75M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$25.42
Change+$0.21 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.01B
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RBGEX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 21B vs. MNHRX (474M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: MNHRX (0.52) vs RBGEX (0.34). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RBGEX (10 years). MNHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RBGEX (1.00). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.25 vs. MNHRX (8.01). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 31.25 vs. MNHRX (7.49).
| MNHRX | RBGEX | MNHRX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.675 | 2.500 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 21B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.34 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.01 | 17.25 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.51 | 5.69 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.49 | 31.25 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.55 | 72.28 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers