Ad is loading...
MNHRX vs RBGEX
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$23.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets427.24M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$22.86
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.04B
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RBGEX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 19B vs. MNHRX (427M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: MNHRX (0.50) vs RBGEX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). MNHRX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). MNHRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.91 vs. RBGEX (-1.21). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.91 vs. MNHRX (13.93).
| MNHRX | RBGEX | MNHRX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.17 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.17 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.425 | -7.823 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 427M | 19B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.91 | -1.21 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.58 | 2.75 | -275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.93 | 39.91 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.52 | 45.41 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...