Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RBGEX
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.77
Change-$0.40 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.04M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$26.09
Change-$0.34 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.83B
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RBGEX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. MNHRX (458M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: MNHRX (0.48) vs RBGEX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. MNHRX (3.03). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.73 vs. MNHRX (11.97).
| MNHRX | RBGEX | MNHRX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.17 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.17 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.792 | 5.202 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 458M | 21.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.03 | 6.66 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.17 | 41.63 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.97 | 43.73 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.12 | 63.87 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers