Ad is loading...
MNHRX vs RBGEX
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RBGEX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets447.12M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$24.42
Change+$0.16 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.28B
MNHRX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RBGEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 20.3B vs. MNHRX (447M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: MNHRX (0.50) vs RBGEX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). MNHRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RBGEX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.26 vs. MNHRX (2.07). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. MNHRX (13.97).
| MNHRX | RBGEX | MNHRX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.17 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.17 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.598 | -1.532 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 20.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.07 | 3.26 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.47 | 25.95 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.97 | 40.79 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.19 | 53.77 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers