Ad is loading...
MNHRX vs RGWBX
MNHRX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$25.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets447.12M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$23.94
Change+$0.15 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.28B
MNHRX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGWBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 20.3B vs. MNHRX (447M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHRX (0.50) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than MNHRX (1.30). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. MNHRX (2.07). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.50 vs. MNHRX (13.97).
| MNHRX | RGWBX | MNHRX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.46 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.46 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.598 | -1.643 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 20.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.07 | 2.88 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.47 | 24.60 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.97 | 38.50 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.19 | 51.75 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers