Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNHRX vs RGWBX
MNHRX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts MNHRX vs RGWBX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
Price$26.58
Change-$0.17 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.17M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$28.03
Change-$0.26 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.34B
MNHRX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNHRX vs. RGWBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNHRX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. MNHRX (458M). MNHRX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: MNHRX (0.46) vs RGWBX (0.00). MNHRX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: MNHRX (15 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than MNHRX (1.30). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNHRX: RGWBX (250) vs MNHRX (2000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. MNHRX (0.77). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.83 vs. MNHRX (8.13).
| MNHRX | RGWBX | MNHRX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.46 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.46 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.701 | 15.160 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 458M | 24.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.77 | 10.79 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.63 | 58.14 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.13 | 40.83 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.46 | 100.96 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers