Ad is loading...
MNLXF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
TRNR
Price
$4.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

MNLXF vs TRNR

Header iconMNLXF vs TRNR Comparison
Open Charts MNLXF vs TRNRBanner chart's image
MiniLuxe Holding
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Interactive Strength
Price$4.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.38M
CapitalizationN/A
MNLXF vs TRNR Comparison Chart
Loading...
TRNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNLXF vs. TRNR commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNLXF is a Hold and TRNR is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (MNLXF: $0.30 vs. TRNR: $4.00)
Brand notoriety: MNLXF and TRNR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNLXF: 20% vs. TRNR: 1006%
Market capitalization -- MNLXF: $33.3M vs. TRNR: $3.79M
MNLXF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $33.3M. TRNR’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $3.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNLXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRNR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRNR is a better buy in the long-term than MNLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRNR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TRNR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MNLXF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +25.00% price change this week, while TRNR (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +14.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRNR is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+2.37% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNLXF($33.3M) has a higher market cap than TRNR($3.79M). MNLXF YTD gains are higher at: -29.295 vs. TRNR (-99.884). MNLXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.56M vs. TRNR (-50.2M). MNLXF has more cash in the bank: 7.79M vs. TRNR (30K). TRNR has less debt than MNLXF: TRNR (7.6M) vs MNLXF (8.94M). MNLXF has higher revenues than TRNR: MNLXF (22.3M) vs TRNR (973K).
MNLXFTRNRMNLXF / TRNR
Capitalization33.3M3.79M878%
EBITDA-4.56M-50.2M9%
Gain YTD-29.295-99.88429%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue22.3M973K2,292%
Total Cash7.79M30K25,950%
Total Debt8.94M7.6M118%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRNR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TRNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QUIK7.520.44
+6.21%
QuickLogic Corp
REAX5.220.29
+5.88%
Real Brokerage (The)
U22.460.83
+3.84%
Unity Software
SNES2.260.04
+1.98%
SenesTech Inc.
RXRX5.75-0.29
-4.80%
Recursion Pharmaceuticals

MNLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNLXF and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNLXF and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNLXF
1D Price
Change %
MNLXF100%
+25.00%
ONVC - MNLXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-14.29%
SDRMF - MNLXF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRNR - MNLXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+11.42%
ISPO - MNLXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
IVP - MNLXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-5.96%
More

TRNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRNR and YTRA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRNR and YTRA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRNR
1D Price
Change %
TRNR100%
+11.42%
YTRA - TRNR
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.12%
MRM - TRNR
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
EJH - TRNR
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
ROL - TRNR
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
IVP - TRNR
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.96%
More