Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNMCX vs VWIAX
MNMCX vs VWIAX Comparison
Open Charts MNMCX vs VWIAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$15.05
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.5M
Vanguard Wellesley® Income Admiral™
Price$64.29
Change-$0.24 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.02B
MNMCX vs VWIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNMCX vs. VWIAX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNMCX is a Buy and VWIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWIAX has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. MNMCX (304M). VWIAX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: VWIAX (3.50) vs MNMCX (1.44). MNMCX was incepted earlier than VWIAX: MNMCX (16 years) vs VWIAX (24 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VWIAX (0.16). MNMCX (59.00) and VWIAX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWIAX: MNMCX (2000) vs VWIAX (50000). VWIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. MNMCX (1.95). VWIAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.58 vs. MNMCX (-0.95).
| MNMCX | VWIAX | MNMCX / VWIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.16 | 1,131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.16 | 1,131% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.360 | 8.548 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 50000 | 4% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 49B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 3.50 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.95 | 3.43 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.17 | 11.10 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.95 | 5.58 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.22 | 30.21 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement