Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNMCX vs VWINX
MNMCX vs VWINX Comparison
Open Charts MNMCX vs VWINX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.96
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.07M
Vanguard Wellesley® Income I
Price$26.28
Change+$0.22 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.31B
MNMCX vs VWINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNMCX vs. VWINX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNMCX is a StrongBuy and VWINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWINX has more cash in the bank: 48.3B vs. MNMCX (305M). VWINX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: VWINX (3.51) vs MNMCX (1.46). MNMCX was incepted earlier than VWINX: MNMCX (16 years) vs VWINX (55 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VWINX (0.23). MNMCX (59.00) and VWINX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWINX: MNMCX (2000) vs VWINX (3000). VWINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.53 vs. MNMCX (2.43). VWINX return over 5 years is better than : 4.26 vs. MNMCX (-1.81).
| MNMCX | VWINX | MNMCX / VWINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.23 | 787% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.23 | 787% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 55 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.724 | 7.435 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 48.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 3.51 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.43 | 3.53 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.33 | 7.08 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.81 | 4.26 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.33 | 30.22 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers