Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNMCX vs VWINX
MNMCX vs VWINX Comparison
Open Charts MNMCX vs VWINX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$15.05
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.5M
Vanguard Wellesley® Income I
Price$26.54
Change-$0.10 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.02B
MNMCX vs VWINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNMCX vs. VWINX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNMCX is a Buy and VWINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWINX has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. MNMCX (304M). VWINX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: VWINX (3.44) vs MNMCX (1.44). MNMCX was incepted earlier than VWINX: MNMCX (16 years) vs VWINX (55 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VWINX (0.23). MNMCX (59.00) and VWINX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWINX: MNMCX (2000) vs VWINX (3000). VWINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.40 vs. MNMCX (1.95). VWINX return over 5 years is better than : 5.37 vs. MNMCX (-0.95).
| MNMCX | VWINX | MNMCX / VWINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.23 | 787% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.23 | 787% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 55 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.360 | 8.498 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 49B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 3.44 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.95 | 3.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.17 | 10.97 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.95 | 5.37 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.22 | 29.65 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement