MNNGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
54.51M
PNDZF
Price
$138.50
Change
-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNNGF vs PNDZF

Header iconMNNGF vs PNDZF Comparison
Open Charts MNNGF vs PNDZFBanner chart's image
Affluent Partners Holdings
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$917
Capitalization54.51M
Pandora A/S
Price$138.50
Change-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Volume$311
Capitalization10.7B
MNNGF vs PNDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNNGF vs. PNDZF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNNGF is a Hold and PNDZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MNNGF: $0.08 vs. PNDZF: $138.50)
Brand notoriety: MNNGF and PNDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNNGF: 100% vs. PNDZF: 135%
Market capitalization -- MNNGF: $54.51M vs. PNDZF: $10.7B
MNNGF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $54.51M. PNDZF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $10.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $290.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNNGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNDZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNDZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNNGF is a better buy in the long-term than PNDZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNDZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PNDZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MNNGF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PNDZF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -18.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+2.27% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNDZF($10.7B) has a higher market cap than MNNGF($54.5M). MNNGF YTD gains are higher at: 60.000 vs. PNDZF (-22.007).
MNNGFPNDZFMNNGF / PNDZF
Capitalization54.5M10.7B1%
EBITDAN/A10.3B-
Gain YTD60.000-22.007-273%
P/E RatioN/A13.14-
RevenueN/A32.5B-
Total CashN/A817M-
Total DebtN/A16.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNNGF vs PNDZF: Fundamental Ratings
MNNGF
PNDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3596
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5653
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5084
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNDZF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as MNNGF (86). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MNNGF (56). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MNNGF (100). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNDZF (84). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PNDZF (100). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew similarly to PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNNGFPNDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGXPF0.240.01
+4.70%
SILVER X MNG CORP.
MZDAY3.380.03
+1.05%
Mazda Motor Corp.
XXMMF0.07N/A
N/A
XIMEN MINING CORP
INDHF24.00N/A
N/A
Indus Holding AG
CAPMF146.74-0.45
-0.31%
Capgemini SE

MNNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNNGF and LVMHF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNNGF and LVMHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNNGF
1D Price
Change %
MNNGF100%
N/A
LVMHF - MNNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
PNDZF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCOHF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - MNNGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MENEF - MNNGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More

PNDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNDZF and DCOHF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNDZF and DCOHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNDZF
1D Price
Change %
PNDZF100%
N/A
DCOHF - PNDZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - PNDZF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMHF - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
PPRUF - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMUY - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
More