MNODF
Price
$14.30
Change
+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
UPMKF
Price
$29.14
Change
+$0.38 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
14.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNODF vs UPMKF

Header iconMNODF vs UPMKF Comparison
Open Charts MNODF vs UPMKFBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$14.30
Change+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Volume$344
Capitalization6.06B
UPM-Kymmene
Price$29.14
Change+$0.38 (+1.32%)
Volume$468
Capitalization14.36B
MNODF vs UPMKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPMKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNODF vs. UPMKF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a StrongBuy and UPMKF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MNODF: $14.30 vs. UPMKF: $29.14)
Brand notoriety: MNODF and UPMKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNODF: 0% vs. UPMKF: 5%
Market capitalization -- MNODF: $6.06B vs. UPMKF: $14.36B
MNODF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $6.06B. UPMKF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $14.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUPMKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UPMKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPMKF is a better buy in the long-term than MNODF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPMKF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UPMKF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UPMKF is a better buy in the short-term than MNODF.

Price Growth

MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while UPMKF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +10.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-1.16% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPMKF($14.4B) has a higher market cap than MNODF($6.06B). UPMKF has higher P/E ratio than MNODF: UPMKF (37.95) vs MNODF (28.03). UPMKF YTD gains are higher at: 9.467 vs. MNODF (3.202). UPMKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.6B vs. MNODF (982M). UPMKF has more cash in the bank: 740M vs. MNODF (168M). MNODF has less debt than UPMKF: MNODF (2.81B) vs UPMKF (4.07B). UPMKF has higher revenues than MNODF: UPMKF (10.2B) vs MNODF (7.59B).
MNODFUPMKFMNODF / UPMKF
Capitalization6.06B14.4B42%
EBITDA982M1.6B61%
Gain YTD3.2029.46734%
P/E Ratio28.0337.9574%
Revenue7.59B10.2B74%
Total Cash168M740M23%
Total Debt2.81B4.07B69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF vs UPMKF: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
UPMKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9937
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9488
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNODF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as UPMKF (13). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to UPMKF’s over the last 12 months.

MNODF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UPMKF (100). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to UPMKF’s over the last 12 months.

UPMKF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (94). This means that UPMKF’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

UPMKF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (81). This means that UPMKF’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

MNODF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as UPMKF (42). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to UPMKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNODFUPMKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPMKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIG47.88N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Acs Inv Gd Cp 1-5Yr Bd ETF
VUSB49.94N/A
-0.01%
Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
QQQG23.68-0.05
-0.22%
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Csh CwsGrLdrsETF
SMRI34.54-0.27
-0.77%
Bushido Capital US Equity ETF
ALTL41.93-0.49
-1.16%
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
+5.68%
POELF - MNODF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - MNODF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
SLVM - MNODF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
HLMMF - MNODF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPMKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPMKF has been loosely correlated with UPMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPMKF jumps, then UPMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPMKF
1D Price
Change %
UPMKF100%
N/A
UPMMY - UPMKF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
SEOAY - UPMKF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
MNODF - UPMKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.68%
SUZ - UPMKF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
ITP - UPMKF
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.44%
More