MNODF
Price
$14.30
Change
+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
UPMMY
Price
$26.85
Change
-$0.35 (-1.29%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
14.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNODF vs UPMMY

Header iconMNODF vs UPMMY Comparison
Open Charts MNODF vs UPMMYBanner chart's image
Mondi
Price$14.30
Change+$0.77 (+5.69%)
Volume$344
Capitalization6.06B
UPM-Kymmene
Price$26.85
Change-$0.35 (-1.29%)
Volume$94.02K
Capitalization14.36B
MNODF vs UPMMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNODF vs. UPMMY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNODF is a StrongBuy and UPMMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MNODF: $14.30 vs. UPMMY: $26.85)
Brand notoriety: MNODF and UPMMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNODF: 0% vs. UPMMY: 94%
Market capitalization -- MNODF: $6.06B vs. UPMMY: $14.36B
MNODF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $6.06B. UPMMY’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $14.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNODF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUPMMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UPMMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPMMY is a better buy in the long-term than MNODF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPMMY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UPMMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNODF is a better buy in the short-term than UPMMY.

Price Growth

MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while UPMMY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-1.16% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPMMY($14.4B) has a higher market cap than MNODF($6.06B). UPMMY has higher P/E ratio than MNODF: UPMMY (34.97) vs MNODF (28.03). MNODF YTD gains are higher at: 3.202 vs. UPMMY (3.040). UPMMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.6B vs. MNODF (982M). UPMMY has more cash in the bank: 740M vs. MNODF (168M). MNODF has less debt than UPMMY: MNODF (2.81B) vs UPMMY (4.07B). UPMMY has higher revenues than MNODF: UPMMY (10.2B) vs MNODF (7.59B).
MNODFUPMMYMNODF / UPMMY
Capitalization6.06B14.4B42%
EBITDA982M1.6B61%
Gain YTD3.2023.040105%
P/E Ratio28.0334.9780%
Revenue7.59B10.2B74%
Total Cash168M740M23%
Total Debt2.81B4.07B69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF vs UPMMY: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
UPMMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9968
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
9488
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1450
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNODF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as UPMMY (11). This means that MNODF’s stock grew similarly to UPMMY’s over the last 12 months.

UPMMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (100). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

UPMMY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (94). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

UPMMY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MNODF (81). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to MNODF’s over the last 12 months.

MNODF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UPMMY (50). This means that MNODF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UPMMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNODFUPMMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OBIOX24.28N/A
N/A
Oberweis International Opps Inv
NSMAX34.40N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
GGHSX39.52N/A
N/A
Invesco Health Care R6
HKDCAD0.18N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Canadian Dollar
NZDJPY86.51N/A
N/A
New Zealand Dollar - Japan Yen

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
+5.68%
POELF - MNODF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - MNODF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
SLVM - MNODF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
HLMMF - MNODF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPMMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPMMY has been closely correlated with SEOAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UPMMY jumps, then SEOAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPMMY
1D Price
Change %
UPMMY100%
-1.28%
SEOAY - UPMMY
70%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
UPMKF - UPMMY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MONDY - UPMMY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
MERC - UPMMY
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.27%
SLVM - UPMMY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More