Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOSX vs REEBX
MNOSX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts MNOSX vs REEBX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$37.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.88M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$64.36
Change+$0.52 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.54B
MNOSX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOSX vs. REEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOSX is a StrongBuy and REEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. MNOSX (354M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than REEBX: MNOSX (0.88) vs REEBX (0.40). MNOSX was incepted earlier than REEBX: MNOSX (7 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MNOSX (1.07). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. REEBX (35.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: REEBX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). REEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.85 vs. MNOSX (9.28). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.33 vs. REEBX (11.54).
| MNOSX | REEBX | MNOSX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.27 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.27 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.325 | 22.009 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 354M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.40 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.28 | 10.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.52 | 49.26 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.33 | 11.54 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement