Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNOSX vs REEBX
MNOSX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts MNOSX vs REEBX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$35.72
Change+$0.28 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.38M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$60.03
Change+$0.73 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.4B
MNOSX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNOSX vs. REEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNOSX is a StrongBuy and REEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. MNOSX (353M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than REEBX: MNOSX (0.92) vs REEBX (0.43). MNOSX was incepted earlier than REEBX: MNOSX (7 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MNOSX (1.07). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. REEBX (35.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: REEBX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). REEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.30 vs. MNOSX (10.86). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. REEBX (9.75).
| MNOSX | REEBX | MNOSX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.27 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.27 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.165 | 13.801 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.43 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.86 | 12.30 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.80 | 22.97 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 9.75 | 380% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement